Literature DB >> 23995538

Outcome after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter study-part 2.

Frédéric Sacher1, Vincent Probst, Philippe Maury, Dominique Babuty, Jacques Mansourati, Yuki Komatsu, Christelle Marquie, Antonio Rosa, Abou Diallo, Romain Cassagneau, Claire Loizeau, Raphael Martins, Michael E Field, Nicolas Derval, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Arnaud Denis, Akihiko Nogami, Philippe Ritter, Jean-Baptiste Gourraud, Sylvain Ploux, Anne Rollin, Adlane Zemmoura, Dominique Lamaison, Pierre Bordachar, Bertrand Pierre, Pierre Jaïs, Jean-Luc Pasquié, Mélèze Hocini, François Legal, Pascal Defaye, Serge Boveda, Yoshito Iesaka, Philippe Mabo, Michel Haïssaguerre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications in Brugada syndrome remain controversial, especially in asymptomatic patients. Previous outcome data are limited by relatively small numbers of patients or short follow-up durations. We report the outcome of patients with Brugada syndrome implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a large multicenter registry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 378 patients (310 male; age, 46±13 years) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (31 for aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 181 for syncope, and 166 asymptomatic) were included. Fifteen patients (4%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 77±42 months, 7 patients (2%) died (1 as a result of an inappropriate shock), and 46 patients (12%) had appropriate device therapy (5±5 shocks per patient). Appropriate device therapy rates at 10 years were 48% for patients whose implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication was aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 19% for those whose indication was syncope, and 12% for the patients who were asymptomatic at implantation. At 10 years, rates of inappropriate shock and lead failure were 37% and 29%, respectively. Inappropriate shock occurred in 91 patients (24%; 4±4 shocks per patient) because of lead failure (n=38), supraventricular tachycardia (n=20), T-wave oversensing (n=14), or sinus tachycardia (n=12). Importantly, introduction of remote monitoring, programming a high single ventricular fibrillation zone (>210-220 bpm), and a long detection time were associated with a reduced risk of inappropriate shock.
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate therapies are more prevalent in symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients but are not insignificant in asymptomatic patients (1%/y). Optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and follow-up dramatically reduce inappropriate shock. However, lead failure remains a major problem in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada syndrome; death, sudden, cardiac; defibrillators, implantable

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23995538     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  47 in total

Review 1.  The Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment of Brugada Syndrome.

Authors:  Johannes Steinfurt; Jürgen Biermann; Christoph Bode; Katja E Odening
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  [Primary and secondary prophylactic ICD therapy in congenital electrical and structural cardiomyopathies].

Authors:  D Duncker; T König; S Hohmann; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 3.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  [Brugada syndrome : Risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death].

Authors:  Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-31

Review 5.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  Brugada Syndrome:Risk Stratification And Management.

Authors:  Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 7.  Baseline fragmented QRS increases the risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pattara Rattanawong; Tanawan Riangwiwat; Narut Prasitlumkum; Nath Limpruttidham; Napatt Kanjanahattakij; Pakawat Chongsathidkiet; Wasawat Vutthikraivit; Eugene H Chung
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  For Whom the Bell Tolls : Refining Risk Assessment for Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Ivaylo Tonchev; David Luria; David Orenstein; Chaim Lotan; Yitschak Biton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Pathogenesis and management of Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Juan Sieira; Gregory Dendramis; Pedro Brugada
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Clinical Profile and Long-Term Follow-Up of Children with Brugada Syndrome.

Authors:  Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Gretje Roterberg; Kim Schlentrich; Volker Liebe; Siegfried Lang; Boris Rudic; Erol Tülümen; Xiaobo Zhou; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.