Literature DB >> 23995513

Honeybee biomarkers as promising tools to monitor environmental quality.

A Badiou-Bénéteau1, A Benneveau, F Géret, H Delatte, N Becker, J L Brunet, B Reynaud, L P Belzunces.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to distinguish the impacts of two different anthropogenic conditions using the honeybee Apis mellifera as a bioindicator associated with a battery of biomarkers previously validated in the laboratory. Both the urban (RAV, Ravine des Cabris) and semi-natural (CIL, Cilaos) sites in La Reunion Island were compared in order to assess the impacts of two types of local pollution using the discriminating potential of biomarkers. Hives were placed at the CIL and RAV sites and honeybees were collected from each hive every three months over one year. Honeybee responses were evaluated with respect to several biochemical biomarkers: glutathione-S-transferase (GST), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and metallothioneins (MT). The results showed a significant difference between the localities in terms of GST, AChE and ALP activities, as regarding midgut MT tissue levels. Compared to the CIL site, ALP and MT tissue levels were higher at the RAV site, although AChE activity was lower. GST displayed more contrasted effects. These results strongly suggest that the honeybees based in the more anthropized area were subjected to sublethal stress involving both oxidative stress and detoxification processes with the occurrence of neurotoxic pollutants, amongst which metals were good candidates. A classification tree enabled defining a decision procedure to distinguish the sampling locations and enabled excellent classification accuracy (89%) for the data set. This field study constitutes a strong support in favour of the in situ assessment of environmental quality using honeybee biomarkers and validates the possibility of performing further ecotoxicological studies using honeybee biomarkers.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Biomonitoring; Discrimination model; Environmental marker; Honeybee

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23995513     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  13 in total

Review 1.  The use of vegetation, bees, and snails as important tools for the biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution-a review.

Authors:  Josephine Al-Alam; Asma Chbani; Ziad Faljoun; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Lethal and sub-lethal effects of select macrocyclic lactones insecticides on forager worker honey bees under laboratory experimental conditions.

Authors:  Gamal A M Abdu-Allah; Barry R Pittendrigh
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Metallothionein in Hermetia illucens (Linnaeus, 1758) larvae (Diptera: Stratiomyidae), a potential biomarker for organic waste system.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Wang; Qiao Gao; Xinhui Liu; Xiao-Ping Wang; Chaoliang Lei; Waheed A A Sayed; Fen Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Apis mellifera ligustica, Spinola 1806 as bioindicator for detecting environmental contamination: a preliminary study of heavy metal pollution in Trieste, Italy.

Authors:  Anita Giglio; Anna Ammendola; Silvia Battistella; Attilio Naccarato; Alberto Pallavicini; Enrico Simeon; Antonio Tagarelli; Piero Giulio Giulianini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Cadmium and Selenate Exposure Affects the Honey Bee Microbiome and Metabolome, and Bee-Associated Bacteria Show Potential for Bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Jason A Rothman; Laura Leger; Jay S Kirkwood; Quinn S McFrederick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Biochemical and histological biomarkers in the midgut of Apis mellifera from polluted environment at Beheira Governorate, Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmed M Abu El-Saad; Dalia A Kheirallah; Lamia M El-Samad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Extending standard testing period in honeybees to predict lifespan impacts of pesticides and heavy metals using dynamic energy budget modelling.

Authors:  H Hesketh; E Lahive; A A Horton; A G Robinson; C Svendsen; A Rortais; J-L Dorne; J Baas; D J Spurgeon; M S Heard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Nosema ceranae, Fipronil and their combination compromise honey bee reproduction via changes in male physiology.

Authors:  Guillaume Kairo; David G Biron; Faten Ben Abdelkader; Marc Bonnet; Sylvie Tchamitchian; Marianne Cousin; Claudia Dussaubat; Boris Benoit; André Kretzschmar; Luc P Belzunces; Jean-Luc Brunet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  First application of an Integrated Biological Response index to assess the ecotoxicological status of honeybees from rural and urban areas.

Authors:  Ilaria Caliani; Tommaso Campani; Barbara Conti; Francesca Cosci; Stefano Bedini; Antonella D'Agostino; Laura Giovanetti; Agata Di Noi; Silvia Casini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Increased Acetylcholinesterase Expression in Bumble Bees During Neonicotinoid-Coated Corn Sowing.

Authors:  Olivier Samson-Robert; Geneviève Labrie; Pierre-Luc Mercier; Madeleine Chagnon; Nicolas Derome; Valérie Fournier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.