Literature DB >> 23995218

The use of weblogs within palliative care: a systematic literature review.

Nothando B Ngwenya1, Stella Mills.   

Abstract

The use of weblogs has had a huge impact within the healthcare sector, and palliative care users have found a way to express themselves using this technology. The objective of this article is to review current research on palliative care service users' experience of using weblogs. A search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed from 2002 to 2012 focusing on weblogs in palliative care. After extensive searches and assessment, six articles were included in the review. Results show that palliative care bloggers find blogging therapeutic and beneficial. Weblogs empowered individuals leading to health behaviour change while also giving them access to social support thus fostering well-being. However, there is lack of robust evidence showing the benefits of blogging using clinical measures or other scientific methods. Given the growth of these weblogs by palliative care patients, research is required to strengthen evidence for their benefit and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patient; end-of-life care; online social support; palliative care; weblogs

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23995218     DOI: 10.1177/1460458213475894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  3 in total

Review 1.  Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review.

Authors:  Anne M Finucane; Hannah O'Donnell; Jean Lugton; Tilly Gibson-Watt; Connie Swenson; Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-04-06

2.  Health co-inquiry in migraine: Online participation and stakeholder experiences before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Camden L Baucke; Lauren S Seifert; Kara Kaelber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Heed or disregard a cancer patient's critical blogging? An experimental study of two different framing strategies.

Authors:  Niels Lynøe; Sara NattochDag; Magnus Lindskog; Niklas Juth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.