Literature DB >> 23994209

Blunted coronary vasodilator response to uridine adenosine tetraphosphate in post-infarct remodeled myocardium is due to reduced P1 receptor activation.

Zhichao Zhou1, Daphne de Wijs-Meijler, Inge Lankhuizen, Joachim Jankowski, Vera Jankowski, A H Jan Danser, Dirk J Duncker, Daphne Merkus.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that uridine adenosine tetraphosphate (Up4A) exerts a potent vasodilator effect in the healthy porcine coronary vasculature. Since the coronary microvascular effects of Up4A after myocardial infarction (MI) are unknown, the present study investigated the response to Up4A in coronary microvessels from post-MI remodeled porcine myocardium, and the involvement of purinergic receptor subtypes. Coronary small arteries (diameter ∼150 μm) were dissected from the apex of Sham-operated swine and swine in which MI had been produced 5 weeks earlier by transient (2h) occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery, and mounted on Mulvany wire myographs. Up4A (10(-9)-10(-5)M) produced coronary vasodilation that was reduced in MI as compared to Sham-operated swine. Up4A-induced vasodilation was reduced by P1 blockade with 8-phenyltheophylline in Sham-operated swine and to a lesser extent in MI, while the attenuation by the A2A receptor blocker SCH58261 was similar in Sham-operated and MI swine. Up4A-induced vasodilation remained unaffected by non-selective P2 receptor antagonist PPADS, but was attenuated by selective P2X1 and P2Y1 receptor antagonists MRS2159 and MRS2179, albeit to a similar extent in Sham-operated and MI swine. These responses were paralleled by similar mRNA expression levels of A2A, P2X1 and P2Y1 receptors in MI compared to slaughterhouse control swine. Finally, attenuation of Up4A-induced coronary vasodilation by nitric oxide synthase inhibition was not attenuated in MI as compared to Sham-operated swine. In conclusion, blunted coronary vasodilation in response to Up4A in MI swine is most likely due to reduced activation of P1, rather than P2, receptors and does not involve a loss of NO bioavailability.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary microcirculation; Myocardial infarction; Purinergic receptor; Up(4)A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23994209     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  12 in total

Review 1.  Uridine adenosine tetraphosphate and purinergic signaling in cardiovascular system: An update.

Authors:  Zhichao Zhou; Takayuki Matsumoto; Vera Jankowski; John Pernow; S Jamal Mustafa; Dirk J Duncker; Daphne Merkus
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Mechanisms underlying uridine adenosine tetraphosphate-induced vascular contraction in mouse aorta: Role of thromboxane and purinergic receptors.

Authors:  Zhichao Zhou; Changyan Sun; Stephen L Tilley; S Jamal Mustafa
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 5.773

3.  Impaired Aortic Contractility to Uridine Adenosine Tetraphosphate in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertensive Mice: Receptor Desensitization?

Authors:  Zhichao Zhou; Vishal R Yadav; Changyan Sun; Bunyen Teng; Jamal S Mustafa
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Temporal Changes in Coronary Hyperemic and Resting Hemodynamic Indices in Nonculprit Vessels of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Nina W van der Hoeven; Gladys N Janssens; Guus A de Waard; Henk Everaars; Christopher J Broyd; Casper W H Beijnink; Peter M van de Ven; Robin Nijveldt; Christopher M Cook; Ricardo Petraco; Tim Ten Cate; Clemens von Birgelen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maarten A H van Leeuwen; Niels van Royen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 5.  Purinergic signaling in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Yi Zhuang; Mei-Ling Yu; Sheng-Feng Lu
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.765

6.  UM206, a selective Frizzled antagonist, attenuates adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction in swine.

Authors:  André Uitterdijk; Kevin C M Hermans; Daphne P M de Wijs-Meijler; Evangelos P Daskalopoulos; Irwin K Reiss; Dirk J Duncker; W Matthijs Blankesteijn; Daphne Merkus
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Divergent coronary flow responses to uridine adenosine tetraphosphate in atherosclerotic ApoE knockout mice.

Authors:  Bunyen Teng; Hicham Labazi; Changyan Sun; Yan Yang; Xiaorong Zeng; S Jamal Mustafa; Zhichao Zhou
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.765

8.  Alteration of Vascular Responsiveness to Uridine Adenosine Tetraphosphate in Aortas Isolated from Male Diabetic Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty Rats: The Involvement of Prostanoids.

Authors:  Takayuki Matsumoto; Shota Kobayashi; Makoto Ando; Maika Iguchi; Keisuke Takayanagi; Mihoka Kojima; Kumiko Taguchi; Tsuneo Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Altered purinergic signaling in uridine adenosine tetraphosphate-induced coronary relaxation in swine with metabolic derangement.

Authors:  Zhichao Zhou; Oana Sorop; Vincent J de Beer; Ilkka Heinonen; Caroline Cheng; A H Jan Danser; Dirk J Duncker; Daphne Merkus
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.765

10.  Uridine Adenosine Tetraphosphate-Induced Coronary Relaxation Is Blunted in Swine With Pressure Overload: A Role for Vasoconstrictor Prostanoids.

Authors:  Zhichao Zhou; Inge M Lankhuizen; Heleen M van Beusekom; Caroline Cheng; Dirk J Duncker; Daphne Merkus
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.