Literature DB >> 23994118

Detection of BRAF V600 mutations in metastatic melanoma: comparison of the Cobas 4800 and Sanger sequencing assays.

Kevin Qu1, Qiulu Pan, Xi Zhang, Luis Rodriguez, Ke Zhang, Hairong Li, Albert Ho, Heather Sanders, Anthony Sferruzza, Shih-Min Cheng, Diedre Nguyen, Dan Jones, Frederic Waldman.   

Abstract

Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation is required for use of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients with metastatic melanoma. Although the Roche Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test is approved, it detects primarily the single-nucleotide V600E mutation and could miss other potentially relevant V600 mutations. To assess the detection rate of the cobas assay for V600 mutations in clinical specimens, we compared the results of this assay with Sanger sequencing in 295 melanoma FFPE samples. Twenty samples were excluded because of invalid results on the cobas (n = 3), sequencing (n = 15), or both (n = 2). V600 mutations were detected by the cobas test in 96 (34.9%) of 275 samples and by Sanger sequencing in 118 (42.9%) of 275 samples. Thus, relative to Sanger sequencing, the cobas test exhibited 80.5% sensitivity (95% CI, 72.4% to 86.6%) and 99.4% specificity (95% CI, 96.5% to 99.9%). Of 23 samples with positive sequencing results but negative cobas results, 21 harbored dinucleotide mutations (V600E in 6, V600K in 10, and V600R in 5); the other two involved single-nucleotide mutations (V600E and V600G). These findings indicate that the cobas assay may miss many V600 mutations in clinical specimens. In our study, the addition of Sanger sequencing for samples with negative cobas results increased the detection rate to 42.9%. This approach could help maximize the number of patients who benefit from BRAF inhibitor treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23994118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  18 in total

1.  Tumor cellularity as a quality assurance measure for accurate clinical detection of BRAF mutations in melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan C Dudley; Grzegorz T Gurda; Li-Hui Tseng; Derek A Anderson; Guoli Chen; Janis M Taube; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Mutation Yield of a 34-Gene Solid Tumor Panel in Community-Based Tumor Samples.

Authors:  Heather Sanders; Kevin Qu; Hairong Li; Lin Ma; Cindy Barlan; Xi Zhang; James Prentice; David Wolfson; Beryl Crossley; Anthony Sferruzza; John Sninsky; David Ross; Andrew Grupe; Joseph Catanese; Feras Hantash; Frederic Waldman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Intra- and Inter-Tumoral Homogeneity of BRAF(V600E) Mutations in Melanoma Tumors.

Authors:  Erica Riveiro-Falkenbach; Cándida A Villanueva; María C Garrido; Yolanda Ruano; Rosa M García-Martín; Elena Godoy; Pablo L Ortiz-Romero; Juan J Ríos-Martín; Angel Santos-Briz; José L Rodríguez-Peralto
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Comparison between two widely used laboratory methods in BRAF V600 mutation detection in a large cohort of clinical samples of cutaneous melanoma metastases to the lymph nodes.

Authors:  Monika Jurkowska; Aleksandra Gos; Konrad Ptaszyński; Wanda Michej; Andrzej Tysarowski; Renata Zub; Janusz A Siedlecki; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  BRAF Mutation Heterogeneity in Melanoma Lesions.

Authors:  Kaori Sakaizawa; Atsuko Ashida; Yukiko Kiniwa; Ryuhei Okuyama
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.875

6.  Selective multiplexed enrichment for the detection and quantitation of low-fraction DNA variants via low-depth sequencing.

Authors:  Ping Song; Sherry X Chen; Yan Helen Yan; Alessandro Pinto; Lauren Y Cheng; Peng Dai; Abhijit A Patel; David Yu Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 29.234

7.  Cost Effectiveness of Sequencing 34 Cancer-Associated Genes as an Aid for Treatment Selection in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Yonghong Li; Lance A Bare; Richard A Bender; John J Sninsky; Leslie S Wilson; James J Devlin; Frederic M Waldman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Detection of BRAF V600 mutations in melanoma: evaluation of concordance between the Cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 mutation test and the methods used in French National Cancer Institute (INCa) platforms in a real-life setting.

Authors:  Samia Mourah; Marc G Denis; Fabienne Escande Narducci; Jérôme Solassol; Jean-Louis Merlin; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Jean-Yves Scoazec; L'Houcine Ouafik; Jean-François Emile; Remy Heller; Claude Souvignet; Loïc Bergougnoux; Jean-Philippe Merlio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Defining the Criteria for Reflex Testing for BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Sarah Zhou; Daniel Sikorski; Honghao Xu; Andrei Zubarev; May Chergui; François Lagacé; Wilson H Miller; Margaret Redpath; Stephanie Ghazal; Marcus O Butler; Teresa M Petrella; Joël Claveau; Carolyn Nessim; Thomas G Salopek; Robert Gniadecki; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Detection of BRAF mutations from solid tumors using Tumorplex™ technology.

Authors:  Jacob Yo; Katie S L Hay; Dilanthi Vinayagamoorthy; Danielle Maryanski; Mark Carter; Joseph Wiegel; Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2015-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.