BACKGROUND: Cortical inhibition plays a critical role in controlling and modulating cortical excitation, and a more detailed understanding of the neuronal circuits contributing to each will provide more insight into their roles in complex cortical computations. Traditional neuronal tracers lack a means for easily distinguishing between circuits of inhibitory and excitatory neurons. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a technique for retrogradely labeling inputs to local clusters of inhibitory or excitatory neurons, but not both, using neurotropic adenoassociated and lentiviral vectors, cell-type-specific promoters, and a modified rabies virus. RESULTS: Applied to primary visual cortex (V1) in mouse, the cell-type-specific tracing technique labeled thousands of presynaptically connected neurons and revealed that the dominant source of input to inhibitory and excitatory neurons is local in origin. Neurons in other visual areas are also labeled; the percentage of these intercortical inputs to excitatory neurons is somewhat higher (~20%) than to inhibitory neurons (<10%), suggesting that intercortical connections have less direct control over inhibition. The inputs to inhibitory neurons were also traced in cat V1, and when aligned with the orientation preference map revealed for the first time that long-range inputs to inhibitory neurons are well tuned to orientation. CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings for inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the visual cortex demonstrate the efficacy of our new technique and its ability to work across species, including larger-brained mammals such as the cat. This paves the way for a better understanding of the roles of specific cell types in higher-order perceptual and cognitive processes.
BACKGROUND: Cortical inhibition plays a critical role in controlling and modulating cortical excitation, and a more detailed understanding of the neuronal circuits contributing to each will provide more insight into their roles in complex cortical computations. Traditional neuronal tracers lack a means for easily distinguishing between circuits of inhibitory and excitatory neurons. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a technique for retrogradely labeling inputs to local clusters of inhibitory or excitatory neurons, but not both, using neurotropic adenoassociated and lentiviral vectors, cell-type-specific promoters, and a modified rabies virus. RESULTS: Applied to primary visual cortex (V1) in mouse, the cell-type-specific tracing technique labeled thousands of presynaptically connected neurons and revealed that the dominant source of input to inhibitory and excitatory neurons is local in origin. Neurons in other visual areas are also labeled; the percentage of these intercortical inputs to excitatory neurons is somewhat higher (~20%) than to inhibitory neurons (<10%), suggesting that intercortical connections have less direct control over inhibition. The inputs to inhibitory neurons were also traced in cat V1, and when aligned with the orientation preference map revealed for the first time that long-range inputs to inhibitory neurons are well tuned to orientation. CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings for inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the visual cortex demonstrate the efficacy of our new technique and its ability to work across species, including larger-brained mammals such as the cat. This paves the way for a better understanding of the roles of specific cell types in higher-order perceptual and cognitive processes.
Authors: Judith A Hirsch; Luis M Martinez; Cinthi Pillai; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Qingbo Wang; Friedrich T Sommer Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-11-16 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Tanjew Dittgen; Axel Nimmerjahn; Shoji Komai; Pawel Licznerski; Jack Waters; Troy W Margrie; Fritjof Helmchen; Winfried Denk; Michael Brecht; Pavel Osten Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-12-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Feng Zhang; Li-Ping Wang; Martin Brauner; Jana F Liewald; Kenneth Kay; Natalie Watzke; Phillip G Wood; Ernst Bamberg; Georg Nagel; Alexander Gottschalk; Karl Deisseroth Journal: Nature Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Xue Han; Xiaofeng Qian; Jacob G Bernstein; Hui-Hui Zhou; Giovanni Talei Franzesi; Patrick Stern; Roderick T Bronson; Ann M Graybiel; Robert Desimone; Edward S Boyden Journal: Neuron Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Andrzej T Foik; Georgina A Lean; Leo R Scholl; Bryce T McLelland; Anuradha Mathur; Robert B Aramant; Magdalene J Seiler; David C Lyon Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Michele A Cox; Kacie Dougherty; Geoffrey K Adams; Eric A Reavis; Jacob A Westerberg; Brandon S Moore; David A Leopold; Alexander Maier Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Jan C Frankowski; Alexa Tierno; Shreya Pavani; Quincy Cao; David C Lyon; Robert F Hunt Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 17.694