Literature DB >> 23993735

Prediction of effect-site concentration of sufentanil by dose-response target controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol for analgesic and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes.

Lingyang Chen1, Mingcang Wang2, Haifei Xiang1, Xianju Lin1, Donghang Cao1, Liyue Ye3.   

Abstract

This study was to investigate the feasibility and efficiency of by target-controlled infusion (TCI) for analgesia and sedation during burn dressing change, and to predict the effect-site concentration of sufentanil. Eighty burn patients were randomly and evenly divided into four groups according to target sufentanil effect-site concentration (0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml). The sufentanil-propofol TCI was carried out during dressing changes. The effect-site concentration of propofol was maintained at 1.2 μg/ml. The dose-response relationships of sufentanil for providing adequate analgesia were evaluated by visual analog scales and Ramsay sedation scores. The effect-site concentration of sufentanil was calculated by Probit regression analysis. Incidence of respiratory depression, doctors and patients' satisfaction and adverse events were assessed. The EC50 and EC95 of sufentanil to maintain anesthesia for uncovering the inner layer dressings during TCI were 0.278 ng/ml (95% CI 0.231-0.318 ng/ml) and 0.394 ng/ml (95% CI 0.366-0.530 ng/ml), respectively, while the EC50 and EC95 of sufentanil to maintain anesthesia for wound management were 0.349 ng/ml (95% CI 0.299-0.366 ng/ml) and 0.465 ng/ml (95% CI 0.430-0.563 ng/ml), respectively. Doctors and patients' satisfaction were significantly higher in the 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml groups than the 0.2 ng/ml group. One and three patients had respiratory depression in the 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml groups, respectively. No adverse events occurred after operations. In conclusion, low dose sufentanil-propofol TCI for anesthesia and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes is feasible and effective, and wound management requires higher effect-site concentrations of sufentanil than disclosing inner layer dressings.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burn; Dressing change; Effective concentration; Sufentanil; Target controlled infusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993735     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  4 in total

1.  American Burn Association Guidelines on the Management of Acute Pain in the Adult Burn Patient: A Review of the Literature, a Compilation of Expert Opinion, and Next Steps.

Authors:  Kathleen S Romanowski; Joshua Carson; Kate Pape; Eileen Bernal; Sam Sharar; Shelley Wiechman; Damien Carter; Yuk Ming Liu; Stephanie Nitzschke; Paul Bhalla; Jeffrey Litt; Rene Przkora; Bruce Friedman; Stephanie Popiak; James Jeng; Colleen M Ryan; Victor Joe
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  A Sensitive Monoclonal-Antibody-Based ELISA for Forchlorfenuron Residue Analysis in Food Samples.

Authors:  Xinmei Liu; Bo Xie; Yongjian Cheng; Lin Luo; Yifan Liang; Zhili Xiao
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol for Sedation after Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.

Authors:  Jihong Xu; Chunji Jin; Xiaopeng Cui; Zhou Jin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-22

4.  Patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus propofol/alfentanil for patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, a randomized, controlled double-blind study.

Authors:  Sherif S Sultan
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.