Literature DB >> 23993684

Comparability of ecological quality boundaries in the Mediterranean basin using freshwater benthic invertebrates. Statistical options and implications.

M J Feio1, J Ferreira2, A Buffagni3, S Erba3, G Dörflinger4, M Ferréol5, A Munné6, N Prat7, I Tziortzis4, G Urbanič8.   

Abstract

Within the Mediterranean region each country has its own assessment method based on aquatic macroinvertebrates. However, independently of the classification system, quality assessments should be comparable across members of the European Commission, which means, among others, that the boundaries between classes should not deviate significantly. Here we check for comparability between High-Good and Good-Moderate classifications, through the use of a common metric. Additionally, we discuss the influence of the conceptual and statistical approaches used to calculate a common boundary within the Mediterranean countries participating in the Intercalibration Exercise (e.g., using individual national type-boundaries, one value for each common type or an average boundary by country; weighted average, median) in the overall outcome. All methods, except for the IBMWP (the Iberian BMWP) when applied to temporary rivers, were highly correlated (0.82<R<0.98) with the common metric STAR-ICMi. This index was shown to respond well to a variety of pressures (especially local habitat alterations, riparian vegetation degradation, nutrient enrichment and chemical contamination, land use and global degradation; p<0.00001) affecting Mediterranean streams. However, depending on the statistical approach used, a different number of class boundaries failed the acceptable deviation from the common boundary (a quarter of class width). That leads to a different percentage of national sites failing to achieve good status and ultimately to a different technical and economic effort in the recovery of streams to that condition. We argue that low/high boundaries might have different meanings not restricted to the quality (good/bad) of reference conditions but also to the natural spatial and temporal variability contained in national and intercalibration types. The highly variable hydrological regimes of Mediterranean streams may influence the reference condition and require further investigation.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bioassessment; Comparability; Intercalibration Exercise; Macroinvertebrates; Mediterranean streams; Water Framework Directive

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993684     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Ecological Status of a Patagonian Mountain River: Usefulness of Environmental and Biotic Metrics for Rehabilitation Assessment.

Authors:  Miserendino M Laura; M Kutschker Adriana; Brand Cecilia; Manna La Ludmila; Prinzio Y Di Cecilia; Papazian Gabriela; Bava José
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World's Rivers: An Overview.

Authors:  Maria João Feio; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto; Susan J Nichols; Oghenekaro N Odume; Bernardo R Quintella; Mathias Kuemmerlen; Francisca C Aguiar; Salomé F P Almeida; Perla Alonso-EguíaLis; Francis O Arimoro; Fiona J Dyer; Jon S Harding; Sukhwan Jang; Philip R Kaufmann; Samhee Lee; Jianhua Li; Diego R Macedo; Ana Mendes; Norman Mercado-Silva; Wendy Monk; Keigo Nakamura; George G Ndiritu; Ralph Ogden; Michael Peat; Trefor B Reynoldson; Blanca Rios-Touma; Pedro Segurado; Adam G Yates
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.103

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.