Literature DB >> 2399321

Thoracic aortic dissection: pitfalls and artifacts in MR imaging.

S L Solomon1, J J Brown, H S Glazer, S A Mirowitz, J K Lee.   

Abstract

Results of 53 thoracic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations were reviewed to determine the prevalence and severity of artifacts and pitfalls that may occur in the evaluation of acute aortic dissection. Grade 1 artifacts and pitfalls were mimics of aortic dissection on individual images but could be demonstrated not to represent a dissection when other images from the same sequence were evaluated. Grade 2 artifacts and pitfalls required the use of images from other planes or sequences to distinguish them from a dissection. Grade 3 artifacts and pitfalls could not be distinguished from a dissection without the use of other imaging modalities. Of the 53 cases examined, 34 (64%) had artifacts or pitfalls of grade 1 or higher, 10 (19%) had artifacts or pitfalls of grade 2 or higher, and one case (2%) had grade 3 artifacts or pitfalls. Sixteen cases had more than one artifact or pitfall. Pitfalls and artifacts that mimic aortic dissection occur in a significant percentage of thoracic MR imaging examinations. An awareness of their existence, knowledge of normal anatomy, the use of axial images in all cases with the addition of images in other planes as needed, rotation of phase and frequency gradients as needed, and clinical correlation may avert misinterpretation in nearly all cases.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2399321     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spin echo and balanced steady state free precession.

Authors:  Rolf Gebker; Osama Gomaa; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Janina Rebakowski; Eckart Fleck; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Dissection of retroesophageal aortic diverticulum and descending aorta in a patient with right aortic arch: magnetic resonance demonstration.

Authors:  S F Ko; S H Ng; M Fu; P H Lo; Y F Cheng; T Y Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Follow-up of aortic dissection: contribution of MR angiography for evaluation of the abdominal aorta and its branches.

Authors:  J Bogaert; B Meyns; F E Rademakers; H Bosmans; J Verschakelen; W Flameng; G Marchal; A L Baert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Aortic pathology revealed by MRI in patients with clinical suspicion of spinal disease.

Authors:  E M Larsson; M Heiling; S Holtås
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases.

Authors:  Jan Bogaert; Marco Francone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.