Literature DB >> 23993170

Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model.

Xin Chen1, Yuanyuan Shen, Yi Zheng, Haoming Lin, Yanrong Guo, Ying Zhu, Xinyu Zhang, Tianfu Wang, Siping Chen.   

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography, based on shear wave propagation, enables the quantitative and non-invasive assessment of liver mechanical properties such as stiffness and has been found to be feasible for and useful in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. Most ultrasound elastographic methods use a purely elastic model to describe liver mechanical properties. However, to describe tissue that is dispersive and to obtain an accurate measure of tissue elasticity, the viscoelasticity of the tissue should be examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the shear viscoelastic characteristics, as measured by ultrasound elastography, of liver fibrosis in a rat model and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of viscoelasticity for staging liver fibrosis. Liver fibrosis was induced in 37 rats using carbon tetrachloride (CCl4); 6 rats served as controls. Liver viscoelasticity was measured in vitro using shear waves induced by acoustic radiation force. The measured mean values of liver elasticity and viscosity ranged from 0.84 to 3.45 kPa and from 1.12 to 2.06 Pa·s for fibrosis stages F0-F4, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that stage of fibrosis was well correlated with elasticity (0.88) and moderately correlated with viscosity (0.66). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.97 (≥F2), 0.91 (≥F3) and 1.00 (F4) for elasticity and 0.91 (≥F2), 0.79 (≥F3) and 0.74 (F4) for viscosity, respectively. The results confirmed that shear wave velocity was dispersive in frequency, suggesting a viscoelastic model to describe liver fibrosis. The study finds that although viscosity is not as good as elasticity for staging fibrosis, it is important to consider viscosity to make an accurate estimation of elasticity; it may also provide other mechanical insights into liver tissues.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic radiation force; Liver fibrosis; Shear wave; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993170     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  12 in total

1.  Elasticity mapping of murine abdominal organs in vivo using harmonic motion imaging (HMI).

Authors:  Thomas Payen; Carmine F Palermo; Stephen A Sastra; Hong Chen; Yang Han; Kenneth P Olive; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Measurement of Liver Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography in a Rat Model: Factors Impacting Stiffness Measurement with Multiple- and Single-Tracking-Location Techniques.

Authors:  Jonathan H Langdon; Etana Elegbe; Raul S Gonzalez; Laurentius Osapoetra; Tristan Ford; Stephen A McAleavey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Ultrasound vibrometry using orthogonal- frequency-based vibration pulses.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Aiping Yao; Shigao Chen; Matthew W Urban; Haoming Lin; Xin Chen; Yanrong Guo; Ke Chen; Tianfu Wang; Siping Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Analyzing and modeling rheological behavior of liver fibrosis in rats using shear viscoelastic moduli.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Yi Zheng; Yuan-yuan Shen; Xin Chen; Xin-yu Zhang; Hao-ming Lin; Yan-rong Guo; Tian-fu Wang; Si-ping Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  Application of Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Biomechanics in Engineered Biomaterials and Tissues.

Authors:  Woong Kim; Virginia L Ferguson; Mark Borden; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Viscoelastic parameter estimation using simulated shear wave motion and convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Luiz Vasconcelos; Piotr Kijanka; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 6.698

Review 7.  Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Mitchell A Kirby; Ivan Pelivanov; Shaozhen Song; Łukasz Ambrozinski; Soon Joon Yoon; Liang Gao; David Li; Tueng T Shen; Ruikang K Wang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  A novel method to make viscoelastic polyacrylamide gels for cell culture and traction force microscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Charrier; Katarzyna Pogoda; Robin Li; Chan Young Park; Jeffrey J Fredberg; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2020-07-02

9.  Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Charrier; Katarzyna Pogoda; Rebecca G Wells; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Elasticity-dependent response of malignant cells to viscous dissipation.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Charrier; Katarzyna Pogoda; Robin Li; Rebecca G Wells; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.