Literature DB >> 23993132

Role of the two-point pull-up technique for treating the uterine arteries during radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy.

Saha Yoo1, Yoshito Terai, Tomohito Tanaka, Yoshimichi Tanaka, Satoshi Tsunetoh, Masanori Kanemura, Masahide Ohmichi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a safe and reliable method for the management of peripheral vessels around the uterine artery during abdominal radical hysterectomy or abdominal radical trachelectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: From 2007 to 2011, 102 patients with invasive cervical cancer underwent an abdominal radical hysterectomy. In 48 operations in 2007-2009, we performed the conventional radical hysterectomy, in which we ligated and cut the uterine arteries at their origin, and we divided the anterior leaf of the vesico-uterine ligament by blindly inserting scissors into the ureteral tunnel, pushing the ureter laterally from the cervix. In 54 operations in 2009-2011, we pulled up the origin and the bifurcation of the uterine artery using vessel tape, skeletonized the uterine artery and directly divided the superficial uterine vein, superior vesical vein and ureteric branch of the uterine artery. We also performed four radical trachelectomies using the two point pull-up method. We investigated whether this method was useful for the management of peripheral vessels around the uterine artery.
RESULTS: The mean total blood loss in the two point pull-up method group (485 ± 270 ml) was significantly lower than that in the conventional surgery group (686 ± 554 ml) (p<0.05). The mean length of the operation in the two point pull-up method group (481 ± 53 min) was not significantly different from the conventional surgery group (497 ± 74 min) (p=0.111). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes in the two point pull-up method group (37.2 ± 11.6) was not significantly different from that in the conventional method group (34.4 ± 10.2) (p=0.096). The overall survival and progression-free survival were also not substantially different between the two groups. In the radical trachelectomy, the mean blood loss was 377.5 ± 185.6 ml and the mean duration of surgery was 520.0 ± 48.5 min using the two point pull-up method. We were able to preserve both uterine arteries without accidental injury or disruptive bleeding. All four patients were menstruating normally as of the last examination.
CONCLUSIONS: The two point pull-up method enabled us to reduce intraoperative blood loss without increasing other complications during abdominal radical hysterectomy or abdominal radical trachelectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal radical trachelectomy; Cervical cancer; Cervicovesical vessels; Fertility-sparing procedure; Radical hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993132     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy as fertility-sparing management for early stages of cervical cancer: Our experience in 18 cases.

Authors:  Szilard Leo Kiss; Anas Fandi; Alexandra Lavinia Cozlea; Mihai Gheorghe; Mihai Stanca; Nicolae Bacalbașa; Andreea Anamaria Moldovan; Mihai Emil Căpîlna
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a Romanian series.

Authors:  Mihai Emil Căpîlna; Nicolae Ioanid; Viorel Scripcariu; Madalina Mihaela Gavrilescu; Bela Szabo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Indocyanine green angiography for preserving the ureteral branch of the uterine artery during radical hysterectomy: Two case report.

Authors:  Ying Long; Yao Yao; De-Sheng Yao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Urodynamic outcomes after pelvic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsunetoh; Yoshito Terai; Masaaki Takai; Satoe Fujiwara; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Tomohito Tanaka; Hiroshi Sasaki; Naokazu Ibuki; Takanobu Ubai; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Haruhito Azuma; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.