PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength of two 4.5-mm screws and three 3.5-mm screws for fixation of the tibial tubercle after anteromedialization osteotomy. METHODS: Anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle was performed on 5 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities. One leg from each pair was randomized to fixation with two 4.5-mm screws and the contralateral leg to fixation with three 3.5-mm screws. Each specimen was loaded cyclically to simulate an active straight-leg raise and then to failure while displacement of the tubercle fragment was recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean tubercle fragment displacement under cyclic loading at any cycle number (P > .352). Maximum failure load for osteotomies secured with two 4.5-mm screws was 1,459 ± 540 N, and for three 3.5-mm screws it was 1,360 ± 707 N. This was not a statistically significant difference (P = .723). Tubercle migration of 7 mm was chosen as clinical failure. At this amount of displacement, mean load was 1,085 ± 398 N and 764 ± 313 N in the 4.5-mm and 3.5-mm groups, respectively, which was also not significantly different (P = .146). CONCLUSIONS: Both 2 × 4.5-mm and 3 × 3.5-mm screw constructs after tibial tubercle anteromedialization are equally capable of withstanding physiologic forces like those encountered during an active straight-leg raise and have similar failure strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although both configurations are comparable, the use of the smaller 3.5-mm screws may reduce the need for hardware removal related to prominence and soft tissue irritation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength of two 4.5-mm screws and three 3.5-mm screws for fixation of the tibial tubercle after anteromedialization osteotomy. METHODS: Anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle was performed on 5 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric lower extremities. One leg from each pair was randomized to fixation with two 4.5-mm screws and the contralateral leg to fixation with three 3.5-mm screws. Each specimen was loaded cyclically to simulate an active straight-leg raise and then to failure while displacement of the tubercle fragment was recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean tubercle fragment displacement under cyclic loading at any cycle number (P > .352). Maximum failure load for osteotomies secured with two 4.5-mm screws was 1,459 ± 540 N, and for three 3.5-mm screws it was 1,360 ± 707 N. This was not a statistically significant difference (P = .723). Tubercle migration of 7 mm was chosen as clinical failure. At this amount of displacement, mean load was 1,085 ± 398 N and 764 ± 313 N in the 4.5-mm and 3.5-mm groups, respectively, which was also not significantly different (P = .146). CONCLUSIONS: Both 2 × 4.5-mm and 3 × 3.5-mm screw constructs after tibial tubercle anteromedialization are equally capable of withstanding physiologic forces like those encountered during an active straight-leg raise and have similar failure strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although both configurations are comparable, the use of the smaller 3.5-mm screws may reduce the need for hardware removal related to prominence and soft tissue irritation.