Literature DB >> 23992936

Clinical outcome after traumatic spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders compared with control patients.

L A Westerveld1, J C van Bemmel1, W J A Dhert1, F C Oner1, J J Verlaan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The clinical outcome of patients with ankylosing spinal disorders (ASDs) sustaining a spinal fracture has been described to be worse compared with the general trauma population.
PURPOSE: To investigate clinical outcome (neurologic deficits, complications, and mortality) after spinal injury in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) compared with control patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients older than 50 years and admitted with a traumatic spinal fracture to the Emergency Department of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, a regional level-1 trauma center and tertiary referral spine center. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity score), mechanism of trauma, fracture characteristics, neurologic deficit, complications, and in-hospital mortality were collected from medical records.
METHODS: With logistic regression analysis, the association between the presence of an ASD and mortality was investigated in relation to other known risk factors for mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 165 patients met the inclusion criteria; 14 patients were diagnosed with AS (8.5%), 40 patients had DISH (24.2%), and 111 patients were control patients (67.3%). Ankylosing spinal disorder patients were approximately five years older than control patients and predominantly of male gender. The Charlson comorbidity score did not significantly differ among the groups, but Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity were more prevalent among DISH patients. In many AS and DISH cases, fractures resulted from low-energy trauma and showed a hyperextension configuration. Patients with AS and DISH were frequently admitted with a neurologic deficit (57.1% and 30.0%, respectively) compared with controls (12.6%; p=.002), which did not improve in the majority of cases. In AS and DISH patients, complication and mortality rates were significantly higher than in controls. Logistic regression analysis showed the parameters age and presence of DISH to be independently, statistically significantly related to mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with AS and DISH showed unstable (hyperextension) fracture configurations and neurologic deficits. Complication and mortality rates were higher in patients with ASD compared with control patients. Increasing age and presence of DISH are predictors of mortality after a spinal fracture.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankylosing spondylitis (AS); Ankylosis; Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH); Spine fracture; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23992936     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  56 in total

1.  Extension type fracture of the ankylotic thoracic spine with gross displacement causing esophageal rupture.

Authors:  F R J Groen; D Delawi; M C Kruyt; F C Oner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Criteria for Early-Phase Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Jonneke S Kuperus; Sytse F Oudkerk; Wouter Foppen; Firdaus A Mohamed Hoesein; Willem Paul Gielis; Job Waalwijk; Elizabeth A Regan; David A Lynch; F Cumhur Oner; Pim A de Jong; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: clinical features and pathogenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Reuven Mader; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Dan Buskila
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Clinical outcomes following spinal fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  M Nugent; M J Berney; S Morris
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Cervical Spinal Fracture and Other Diagnoses Associated With Mortality in Hospitalized Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients.

Authors:  Katherine D Wysham; Sara G Murray; Nancy Hills; Edward Yelin; Lianne S Gensler
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis association with thoracic spine kyphosis: a cross-sectional study for the Health Aging and Body Composition Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Nancy E Lane; Neeta Parimi; Peggy M Cawthon; Bo Fan; John Shepherd; Jane Cauley; Audrey Zucker-Levin; Rachel A Murphy; Wendy B Katzman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Management of aortic injury during minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Michael M Safaee; Devin Zarkowsky; Charles M Eichler; Murat Pekmezci; Aaron J Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Evolution of traumatic spinal cord injury in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, in a Romanian rehabilitation clinic.

Authors:  Aurelian Anghelescu; Liliana Valentina Onose; Cristina Popescu; Ioana Andone; Cristina Octaviana Daia; Anca Magdalena Magdoiu; Aura Spanu; Gelu Onose
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-07-07

Review 9.  [Surgical management of ankylosing spondylitis (Bechterew's disease)].

Authors:  H Allouch; M Shousha; H Böhm
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Is Long-Segment Fixation a Rule in Fractures Associated With Ankylosing Spondylitis?

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Varun K Agarwal; Nandish Kumar Kc; Avinash Kumar; Ankit Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.