Literature DB >> 23992890

Seizure outcome after hippocampal deep brain stimulation in a prospective cohort of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy.

Arthur Cukiert1, Cristine Mella Cukiert2, Jose Augusto Burattini2, Alessandra Moura Lima2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we present the results obtained from a series of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (r-TLE) who underwent hippocampal deep brain stimulation (Hip-DBS).
METHODS: Nine consecutive adult patients were studied. Low-frequency and high-frequency stimulation was carried out immediately after the insertion of each electrode. Chronic continuous high-frequency stimulation was used during treatment. The mean follow-up time was 30.1 months. The mean age of the patients was 37.2 years. The MRI scan was normal in three patients; four patients had bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), and two had unilateral MTS.
RESULTS: The patients with unilateral MTS received unilateral implantation and experienced a 76% and an 80% reduction in seizure frequency after Hip-DBS. All patients with normal MRI scans were implanted bilaterally. Two of these patients received unilateral activation of the electrodes and experienced a 97% and an 80% reduction in seizure frequency; the third patient had bilateral activation of the device and was a non-responder. All patients with bilateral MTS were implanted bilaterally. Three of these patients received unilateral activation of the device and experienced a 66%, a 66% and a 100% reduction in seizure frequency after Hip-DBS; one patient had bilateral electrode activation, and was a non-responder. Whenever present, generalised tonic-clonic seizures disappeared completely after Hip-DBS.
CONCLUSIONS: Although performed on a relatively small number of patients, Hip-DBS was safe and effective in our patients with r-TLE. Seven of the nine patients were considered responders. Hip-DBS might represent a useful therapeutic option in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy who were not candidates for resective surgery or have had previous failed procedures.
Copyright © 2013 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Epilepsy; Outcome; Temporal lobe

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23992890     DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN: 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  17 in total

1.  Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reduces glucose utilization in the healthy rat brain.

Authors:  Nathalie Van Den Berge; Vincent Keereman; Christian Vanhove; Bregt Van Nieuwenhuyse; Pieter van Mierlo; Robrecht Raedt; Kristl Vonck; Paul Boon; Roel Van Holen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Mathieu Sprengers; Kristl Vonck; Evelien Carrette; Anthony G Marson; Paul Boon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 3.  Epileptic activity in Alzheimer's disease: causes and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Keith A Vossel; Maria C Tartaglia; Haakon B Nygaard; Adam Z Zeman; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Long-term efficacy and cognitive effects of bilateral hippocampal deep brain stimulation in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Shu Wang; Meng Zhao; Tianfu Li; Chunsheng Zhang; Jian Zhou; Mengyang Wang; Xiongfei Wang; Kaiqiang Ma; Guoming Luan; Yuguang Guan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Deep brain stimulation for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with an emphasis on alleviation of seizure frequency outcome.

Authors:  Bowen Chang; Jiwen Xu
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Electrical brain stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert S Fisher; Ana Luisa Velasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Functional MRI during Hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation in the Healthy Rat Brain.

Authors:  Nathalie Van Den Berge; Christian Vanhove; Benedicte Descamps; Ine Dauwe; Pieter van Mierlo; Kristl Vonck; Vincent Keereman; Robrecht Raedt; Paul Boon; Roel Van Holen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Epilepsy surgery: current status and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Kensuke Kawai
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Clinical utility of implantable neurostimulation devices as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled seizures.

Authors:  Joanna H Cox; Stefano Seri; Andrea E Cavanna
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.