Literature DB >> 23992559

Nitrate-potentiated head-up tilt testing (HUT) has a low diagnostic yield in patients with likely vasovagal syncope.

Nunzia R Petix1, Attilio Del Rosso, Raffaello Furlan, Vincenzo Guarnaccia, Andrea Zipoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is characterized by a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, but the relationship between clinical presentation and response to head-up tilt testing (HUT) has not yet been evaluated in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the clinical presentation of VVS and HUT and clinical outcome at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Out of 671 consecutive subjects undergoing nitroglycerin-potentiated HUT for suspected VVS, 369 patients with normal electrocardiogram and no structural heart disease were included in our study.
RESULTS: A history suggestive of typical or atypical VVS was obtained in 198 and 171 patients, respectively. The positivity rate of HUT was 65% and 36% in patients with established and likely VVS, respectively (P < 0.0001). In patients with established VVS, a time interval of ≤28 days between the last syncope and HUT was the only independent predictor of a positive test. In patients with likely VVS, no variable was predictive of a positive HUT. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 27 months, the rate of adverse events (all-cause mortality, syncope recurrence, and major diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures) was similar in patients of both groups, independent of HUT results.
CONCLUSION: In patients with likely VVS, HUT has a low-diagnostic yield and may be inadequate to establish a reliable diagnosis. Similar long-term outcomes were observed in patients with positive or negative test results, suggesting that HUT is of limited value in the management of patients with suspected neurally mediated syncope. ©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical history; head-up tilt testing; vasovagal syncope

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23992559     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Calgary score and modified Calgary score in the differential diagnosis between neurally mediated syncope and epilepsy in children.

Authors:  Runmei Zou; Shuo Wang; Liping Zhu; Lijia Wu; Ping Lin; Fang Li; Zhenwu Xie; Xiaohong Li; Cheng Wang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  The pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with hypotensive susceptibility.

Authors:  Ashish Chaddha; Martina Rafanelli; Michele Brignole; Richard Sutton; Kevin E Wenzke; Stephen L Wasmund; Richard L Page; Mohamed H Hamdan
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Heart rate variability analysis during head-up tilt test predicts nitroglycerine-induced syncope.

Authors:  Kristian Efremov; Donatella Brisinda; Angela Venuti; Emilia Iantorno; Claudia Cataldi; Francesco Fioravanti; Riccardo Fenici
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-06-14

4.  Isoprenaline versus nitroglycerine in head-up tilt test.

Authors:  Umesh R Bilagi; Jayaprakash Shenthar; Manjunath Nanjappa Cholenahally
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 5.  Treatment of Neurocardiogenic Syncope: From Conservative to Cutting-edge.

Authors:  Amulya Gampa; Gaurav A Upadhyay
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-07-15

6.  Clinical Features of Patients Undergoing the Head-Up Tilt Test and Its Safety and Efficacy in Diagnosing Vasovagal Syncope in 4,873 Patients.

Authors:  Lingping Xu; Xiangqi Cao; Rui Wang; Yichao Duan; Ye Yang; Junlong Hou; Jing Wang; Bin Chen; Xianjun Xue; Bo Zhang; Hua Ma; Chaofeng Sun; Fengwei Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-12

7.  Tilt test in paced patients: Is it worth the effort?

Authors:  Kartikeya Bhargava
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-10-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.