RATIONALE: The aging population may strain intensive care unit (ICU) capacity and adversely affect patient outcomes. Existing fluctuations in demand for ICU care offer an opportunity to explore such relationships. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether transient increases in ICU strain influence patient mortality, and to identify characteristics of ICUs that are resilient to surges in capacity strain. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 264,401 patients admitted to 155 U.S. ICUs from 2001 to 2008. We used logistic regression to examine relationships of measures of ICU strain (census, average acuity, and proportion of new admissions) near the time of ICU admission with mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 36,465 (14%) patients died in the hospital. ICU census on the day of a patient's admission was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 per standardized unit increase; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.03). This effect was greater among ICUs employing closed (OR, 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.12) versus open (OR, 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.03) physician staffing models (interaction P value = 0.02). The relationship between census and mortality was stronger when the census was composed of higher acuity patients (interaction P value < 0.01). Averaging strain over the first 3 days of patients' ICU stays yielded similar results except that the proportion of new admissions was now also associated with mortality (OR, 1.04 for each 10% increase; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Several sources of ICU strain are associated with small but potentially important increases in patient mortality, particularly in ICUs employing closed staffing models. Although closed ICUs may promote favorable outcomes under static conditions, they are susceptible to being overwhelmed by patient influxes.
RATIONALE: The aging population may strain intensive care unit (ICU) capacity and adversely affect patient outcomes. Existing fluctuations in demand for ICU care offer an opportunity to explore such relationships. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether transient increases in ICU strain influence patient mortality, and to identify characteristics of ICUs that are resilient to surges in capacity strain. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 264,401 patients admitted to 155 U.S. ICUs from 2001 to 2008. We used logistic regression to examine relationships of measures of ICU strain (census, average acuity, and proportion of new admissions) near the time of ICU admission with mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 36,465 (14%) patients died in the hospital. ICU census on the day of a patient's admission was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 per standardized unit increase; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.03). This effect was greater among ICUs employing closed (OR, 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.12) versus open (OR, 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.03) physician staffing models (interaction P value = 0.02). The relationship between census and mortality was stronger when the census was composed of higher acuity patients (interaction P value < 0.01). Averaging strain over the first 3 days of patients' ICU stays yielded similar results except that the proportion of new admissions was now also associated with mortality (OR, 1.04 for each 10% increase; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Several sources of ICU strain are associated with small but potentially important increases in patient mortality, particularly in ICUs employing closed staffing models. Although closed ICUs may promote favorable outcomes under static conditions, they are susceptible to being overwhelmed by patient influxes.
Authors: Mark A Kelley; Derek Angus; Donald B Chalfin; Edward D Crandall; David Ingbar; Wanda Johanson; Justine Medina; Curtis N Sessler; Jeffery S Vender Journal: Chest Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: S S Carson; C Stocking; T Podsadecki; J Christenson; A Pohlman; S MacRae; J Jordan; H Humphrey; M Siegler; J Hall Journal: JAMA Date: 1996 Jul 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas L Higgins; Daniel Teres; Wayne S Copes; Brian H Nathanson; Maureen Stark; Andrew A Kramer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Kathleen McCauley; Dorrie Fontaine; Joseph J Frassica; Rolf Hubmayr; Judith Jacobi; Roy G Brower; Donald Chalfin; William Sibbald; David A Asch; Mark Kelley; Derek C Angus Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Lyle H Ungar; Michael O Harhay; Casey S Greene; Blanca E Himes; Scott D Halpern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Michael O Harhay; Kelly C Vranas; Elizabeth Cooney; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-02
Authors: Sydney E S Brown; Michael M Rey; Dustin Pardo; Scott Weinreb; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Nicole B Gabler; Scott D Halpern Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405