Literature DB >> 23991812

Cingulotomy for medically refractory cancer pain.

Ashwin Viswanathan1, Viraat Harsh, Erlick A C Pereira, Tipu Z Aziz.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Cingulotomy has been reported in the literature as a potential treatment option for refractory cancer-related pain. However, the optimal candidates for this intervention and the outcomes are not well characterized. The goal of this study was to review the available literature on cingulotomy, specifically for cancer-related pain.
METHODS: A search of PubMed, PubMed Central, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE was performed to identify all articles discussing cingulotomy for cancer pain. The text strings "cingul*" and "pain" were separated by the Boolean AND operator, and used to perform the query on PubMed. Only studies in which a stereotactic technique was used, as opposed to an open technique, and specifically detailing outcomes for cancer pain were included. For centers with multiple publications, care was taken not to double-count individual patients.
RESULTS: The literature review revealed only 8 unique studies describing outcomes of stereotactic cingulotomy for cancer pain. Between 32% and 83% of patients had meaningful pain relief. The location of the lesion was variable, ranging between 1 cm and 4 cm posterior to the tip of the anterior horn. Although serious adverse events are rare, a decline in focused attention can been seen in the early postoperative period, along with apathy and decreased activity.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with cancer pain with diffuse pain syndromes, head and neck malignancies, and significant emotional distress, cingulotomy may be a safe treatment option with minimal cognitive changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991812     DOI: 10.3171/2013.6.FOCUS13236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  6 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Bilateral Anterior Cingulotomy via Open Minicraniotomy Using a Novel Multiport Cisternoscope: A Cadaveric Demonstration.

Authors:  Sunil Manjila; Benoit Rosa; Margherita Mencattelli; Pierre E Dupont
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 2.  Neuropathic pain and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Erlick A C Pereira; Tipu Z Aziz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain.

Authors:  Mansoor M Aman; Ammar Mahmoud; Timothy Deer; Dawood Sayed; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Shane E Brogan; Vinita Singh; Amitabh Gulati; Natalie Strand; Jacqueline Weisbein; Johnathan H Goree; Fangfang Xing; Ali Valimahomed; Daniel J Pak; Antonios El Helou; Priyanka Ghosh; Krishna Shah; Vishal Patel; Alexander Escobar; Keith Schmidt; Jay Shah; Vishal Varshney; William Rosenberg; Sanjeet Narang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Optical inactivation of the anterior cingulate cortex modulate descending pain pathway in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain created via chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve.

Authors:  Hyeong Cheol Moon; Won Ik Heo; Yon Ji Kim; Daae Lee; So Yoon Won; Hong Rae Kim; Seung Man Ha; Youn Joo Lee; Young Seok Park
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 5.  The Current State of Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain and Its Context in Other Forms of Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Sarah Marie Farrell; Alexander Green; Tipu Aziz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 6.  The Co-evolution of Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Timothy G Dyster; Charles B Mikell; Sameer A Sheth
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.856

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.