Literature DB >> 23991724

Age-related variation in energy expenditure in a long-lived bird within the envelope of an energy ceiling.

Kyle H Elliott1, Maryline Le Vaillant, Akiko Kato, Anthony J Gaston, Yan Ropert-Coudert, James F Hare, John R Speakman, Donald Croll.   

Abstract

Energy expenditure in wild animals can be limited (i) intrinsically by physiological processes that constrain an animal's capacity to use energy, (ii) extrinsically by energy availability in the environment and/or (iii) strategically based on trade-offs between elevated metabolism and survival. Although these factors apply to all individuals within a population, some individuals expend more or less energy than other individuals. To examine the role of an energy ceiling in a species with a high and individually repeatable metabolic rate, we compared energy expenditure of thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia) with and without handicaps during a period of peak energy demand (chick-rearing, N = 16). We also compared energy expenditure of unencumbered birds (N = 260) across 8 years exhibiting contrasting environmental conditions and correlated energy expenditure with fitness (reproductive success and survival). Murres experienced an energy ceiling mediated through behavioural adjustments. Handicapped birds decreased time spent flying/diving and chick-provisioning rates such that overall daily energy expenditure remained unchanged across the two treatments. The energy ceiling did not reflect energy availability or trade-offs with fitness, as energy expenditure was similar across contrasting foraging conditions and was not associated with reduced survival or increased reproductive success. We found partial support for the trade-off hypothesis as older murres, where prospects for future reproduction would be relatively limited, did overcome an energy ceiling to invest more in offspring following handicapping by reducing their own energy reserves. The ceiling therefore appeared to operate at the level of intake (i.e. digestion) rather than expenditure (i.e. thermal constraint, oxidative stress). A meta-analysis comparing responses of breeding animals to handicapping suggests that our results are typical: animals either reduced investment in themselves or in their offspring to remain below an energy ceiling. Across species, whether a handicapped individual invested in its own energy stores or its offspring's growth was not explained by life history (future vs. current reproductive potential). Many breeding animals apparently experience an intrinsic energy ceiling, and increased energy costs lead to a decline in self-maintenance and/or offspring provisioning.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Uria lomvia; device effects; doubly labelled water; energy ceiling; extrinsic limitation; intrinsic limitation; repeatability; thick-billed murre

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991724     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  16 in total

1.  Windscapes shape seabird instantaneous energy costs but adult behavior buffers impact on offspring.

Authors:  Kyle Hamish Elliott; Lorraine S Chivers; Lauren Bessey; Anthony J Gaston; Scott A Hatch; Akiko Kato; Orla Osborne; Yan Ropert-Coudert; John R Speakman; James F Hare
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.600

2.  Food supply and individual quality influence seabird energy expenditure and reproductive success.

Authors:  Shirel R Kahane-Rapport; Shannon Whelan; Justine Ammendolia; Scott A Hatch; Kyle H Elliott; Shoshanah Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Extraordinarily rapid proliferation of cultured muscle satellite cells from migratory birds.

Authors:  Kevin G Young; Timothy R H Regnault; Christopher G Guglielmo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.812

4.  High corticosterone, not high energy cost, correlates with reproductive success in the burrow-nesting ancient murrelet.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Kyle H Elliott; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Anthony J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Simple and noninvasive method for assessment of digestive efficiency: Validation of fecal steatocrit in greenfinch coccidiosis model.

Authors:  Richard Meitern; Mari-Ann Lind; Ulvi Karu; Peeter Hõrak
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Short-term behavioural impact contrasts with long-term fitness consequences of biologging in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Natasha Gillies; Annette L Fayet; Oliver Padget; Martyna Syposz; Joe Wynn; Sarah Bond; James Evry; Holly Kirk; Akiko Shoji; Ben Dean; Robin Freeman; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Foraging flexibility and search patterns are unlinked during breeding in a free-ranging seabird.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Dave Boyle; Annette Fayet; Ben Dean; Holly Kirk; Robin Freeman; Chris Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.573

8.  High levels of isotope elimination improve precision and allow individual-based measurements of metabolic rates in animals using the doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  Masaki Shirai; Yasuaki Niizuma; Maki Yamamoto; Emiko Oda; Naoyuki Ebine; Nariko Oka; Ken Yoda
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-11

9.  Time budget, oxygen consumption and body mass responses to parasites in juvenile and adult wild rodents.

Authors:  Mario Garrido; Valeria Hochman Adler; Meital Pnini; Zvika Abramsky; Boris R Krasnov; Roee Gutman; Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Hadas Hawlena
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Oxidative stress and life histories: unresolved issues and current needs.

Authors:  John R Speakman; Jonathan D Blount; Anne M Bronikowski; Rochelle Buffenstein; Caroline Isaksson; Tom B L Kirkwood; Pat Monaghan; Susan E Ozanne; Michaël Beaulieu; Michael Briga; Sarah K Carr; Louise L Christensen; Helena M Cochemé; Dominic L Cram; Ben Dantzer; Jim M Harper; Diana Jurk; Annette King; Jose C Noguera; Karine Salin; Elin Sild; Mirre J P Simons; Shona Smith; Antoine Stier; Michael Tobler; Emma Vitikainen; Malcolm Peaker; Colin Selman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.