Literature DB >> 23991639

Reference frames in visual selection.

Glyn W Humphreys1, Celine R Gillebert, Magda Chechlacz, M Jane Riddoch.   

Abstract

We review neuropsychological evidence for visual selection operating in different reference frames. There is general agreement that there may be a separation of coding space near to and farther from the body, and that deficits in selecting stimuli within each form of spatial representation may be impaired in patients with unilateral neglect. However, there remains a lack of consensus about whether all forms of spatial representation relate to the body or whether there are spatial representations based on reference frames abstracted from the body (allocentric and object-centered spatial codes). Here we will review the evidence for spatial coding in these more abstracted reference frames (allocentric and object-centered but also environmental) and argue for the psychological reality of (at least) allocentric spatial coding. We discuss computational accounts of how such codes may be created as objects are selected.
© 2013 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; neglect; reference frame

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991639     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  4 in total

Review 1.  Are All Spatial Reference Frames Egocentric? Reinterpreting Evidence for Allocentric, Object-Centered, or World-Centered Reference Frames.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Real-time Acute Stress Facilitates Allocentric Spatial Processing in a Virtual Fire Disaster.

Authors:  Zhengcao Cao; Yamin Wang; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Ego- and allocentric visuospatial neglect: Dissociations, prevalence, and laterality in acute stroke.

Authors:  Nele Demeyere; Celine R Gillebert
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret J Moore; Kathleen Vancleef; M Jane Riddoch; Celine R Gillebert; Nele Demeyere
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.