AIM: To explore the correlation between the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and by histological measurements in normal adult rats and optic nerve transected rats. METHODS: The RNFL thickness of 36 rats was scanned in a circle 3.46mm far from the optic disc by OCT. The two experimental groups were the normal group (n=20 rats) and the optic nerve transected group (n=16 rats). The latter group included 4 groups (n=4/group) surviving for 1 day, 3, 5 and 7 days. Then the RNFL thickness of the same retina area was also measured by NF-200 immunohistochemical staining method. Linear regression was used to analyze the correlation between the data obtained from these two methods. RESULTS: The RNFL thickness of normal right eyes around optic disc by OCT was 72.35±5.71µm and that of the left eyes was 72.65±5.88µm (P=0.074). The RNFL thickness of the corresponding histological section by immunohistochemistry was 37.54±4.05µm (right eyes) and 37.38±4.23µm (left eyes) (P=0.059). There was a good correlation between the RNFL thickness measured by OCT and that measured by histology (R(2)=0.8131). After optic nerve transection, the trend of the RNFL thickness was thinner with the prolonged survival time. The correlation of the thickness detected by the above two methods was approximately (R(2)=0.8265). Value of the RNFL thickness in rats around optic disc measured by OCT was obviously higher than that measured by common histological measurement in normal adult rats and optic nerve transected rats. CONCLUSION: The RNFL thickness measured by OCT has a strong correlation with that measured by histological method. Through OCT scanning, we found that the thickness of RNFL gradually becomes thinner in a time-dependent manner.
AIM: To explore the correlation between the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and by histological measurements in normal adult rats and optic nerve transected rats. METHODS: The RNFL thickness of 36 rats was scanned in a circle 3.46mm far from the optic disc by OCT. The two experimental groups were the normal group (n=20 rats) and the optic nerve transected group (n=16 rats). The latter group included 4 groups (n=4/group) surviving for 1 day, 3, 5 and 7 days. Then the RNFL thickness of the same retina area was also measured by NF-200 immunohistochemical staining method. Linear regression was used to analyze the correlation between the data obtained from these two methods. RESULTS: The RNFL thickness of normal right eyes around optic disc by OCT was 72.35±5.71µm and that of the left eyes was 72.65±5.88µm (P=0.074). The RNFL thickness of the corresponding histological section by immunohistochemistry was 37.54±4.05µm (right eyes) and 37.38±4.23µm (left eyes) (P=0.059). There was a good correlation between the RNFL thickness measured by OCT and that measured by histology (R(2)=0.8131). After optic nerve transection, the trend of the RNFL thickness was thinner with the prolonged survival time. The correlation of the thickness detected by the above two methods was approximately (R(2)=0.8265). Value of the RNFL thickness in rats around optic disc measured by OCT was obviously higher than that measured by common histological measurement in normal adult rats and optic nerve transected rats. CONCLUSION: The RNFL thickness measured by OCT has a strong correlation with that measured by histological method. Through OCT scanning, we found that the thickness of RNFL gradually becomes thinner in a time-dependent manner.
Authors: Eric J Knott; Kristopher G Sheets; Yongdong Zhou; William C Gordon; Nicolas G Bazan Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Joel S Schuman; Tamar Pedut-Kloizman; Helena Pakter; Nan Wang; Viviane Guedes; Lina Huang; Liselotte Pieroth; Wayne Scott; Michael R Hee; James G Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Gadi Wollstein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marco Ruggeri; Hassan Wehbe; Shuliang Jiao; Giovanni Gregori; Maria E Jockovich; Abigail Hackam; Yuanli Duan; Carmen A Puliafito Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Y Huang; A V Cideciyan; G I Papastergiou; E Banin; S L Semple-Rowland; A H Milam; S G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michael X Repka; Raymond T Kraker; Susanna M Tamkins; Donny W Suh; Nicholas A Sala; Roy W Beck Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03-27 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ji Ho Yang; Hyung Woo Kwak; Tae Gi Kim; Jisang Han; Sang Woong Moon; Seung Young Yu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.799