| Literature DB >> 23990877 |
João Leitão1, Rui Ribeiro, Amadeu M V M Soares, Isabel Lopes.
Abstract
Considering IPPC climate change scenarios, it is pertinent to predict situations where coastal ecosystems already impacted with chemical contamination became exposed to an additional stressor under a future scenario of seawater intrusion. Accordingly, the present study aimed at evaluating if a negative association between tolerance to a metal and to saltwater exists among genotypes of a freshwater organism. For this, five clonal lineages of the cladoceran Daphnia longispina O.F. Müller, exhibiting a differential tolerance to lethal levels of copper, were selected. Each clonal lineage was exposed to lethal and sublethal concentrations of sodium chloride (assumed as a protective surrogate to evaluate the toxicity of increased salinity to freshwater organisms). Mortality, time to release the first brood and total number of neonates per female were monitored and the somatic growth rate and intrinsic rate of natural increase were computed for each clonal lineage. Data here obtained were compared with their lethal responses to copper and significant negative correlations were found. These results suggest that genetically eroded populations of D. longispina, due to copper or salinity, may be particularly susceptible to a later exposure to the other contaminant supporting the multiple stressors differential tolerance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23990877 PMCID: PMC3753282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Allozyme and microsatellite profiles of the five clonal lineages of Daphnia longispina (from [23], [24]).
| Lineage | Allozyme profile | Microsatellite profile |
| E89 | a | IV |
| N91 | c | I |
| N31 | c | VI |
| E99 | c | I |
| N116 | e | VIII |
Values of the median lethal concentrations (respective 95% confidence limits) of copper (adapted from [28]) and of median, lower and upper quartile lethal concentrations of NaCl (LC25,48 h, LC50,48 h, LC75,48 h, respectively) for the five clonal lineages of Daphnia longispina, after being exposed to this metal for 48 h.
| LC50,48h Cu | LC25,48h NaCl | LC50,48h NaCl | LC75,48h NaCl | |
| E99 | 163 (156–170) | 2.48 (2.43–2.53) | 2.50 (2.47–2.57) | 2.57 (2.53–2.62) |
| N91 | 158 (138–175) | 2.64 (2.47–2.74) | 2.80 (2.69–2.92) | 2.99 (2.88–3.16) |
| N116 | 141 (133–148) | 2.57 (2.27–2.74) | 2.85 (2.65–3.00) | 3.16 (3.01–3.41) |
| N31 | 51.6 (49.7–53.5) | 2.27 (1.45–2.49) | 2.48 (1.90–2.70) | 2.72 (2.45–2.91) |
| E89 | 18.2 (13.1–21.1) | 2.55 (2.24–2.72) | 2.82 (2.62–2.97) | 3.13 (2.97–3.38) |
Figure 1Average of total number of neonates released per female (B) with the respective standard deviation (error bars), of five clonal lineages of Daphnia longispina exposed to a gradient of NaCl. *symbolizes significant differences relatively to the control (p≤10−4).
Values of NaCl concentrations provoking 25, 50, and 75% (EC25, EC50, and EC75, respectively) decrease in reproduction of the five clonal lineages of Daphnia longispina. (respectively 95% confidence limits).
| EC25 NaCl | EC50 NaCl | EC75 NaCl | EC25 Curve fit | EC50 Curve fit | EC75 Curve fit | |
| E99 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 1.41 | Rep = 15(±1.5)/(1+[(0.33)×(Conc/0.70)3.3(±0.1)] | Rep = 15(±1.5)/(1+(Conc/0.99)3.3(±0.1)) | Rep = 15(±1.5)/(1+[(3)×(Conc/1.41)3.3(±0.1)] |
| (0.45–0.95) | (0.79–1.20) | (1.04–1.79) | R = 0.63 | R = 0.63 | R = 0.63 | |
| N91 | 0.98 | 1.73 | 3.05 | Rep = 18(±1.1)/(1+[(0.33)×(Conc/0.98)2.0(±0.7)] | Rep = 18(±1.1)/(1+(Conc/1.73)2.0(±0.7)) | Rep = 18(±1.1)/(1+[(3)×(Conc/3.05)2.0(±0.7)] |
| (0.66–1.30) | (1.17–2.29) | (1.05–5.05) | R = 0.58 | R = 0.63 | R = 0.58 | |
| N116 | 0.92 | 1.13 | 1.42 | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+[(0.33)×(Conc/0.92)5.1(±1.2)] | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+(Conc/1.13)5.1(±1.2)) | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+[(3)×(Conc/1.42)5.1(±1.2)] |
| (0.76–1.07) | (1.01–1.26) | (1.22–1.61) | R = 0.78 | R = 0.78 | R = 0.78 | |
| N31 | 1.12 | 1.41 | 1.70 | Rep = 26(±1.4)/(1+[(0.33)×(Conc/1.12)5.3(±1.4)] | Rep = 26(±1.4)/(1+(Conc/1.41)5.3(±1.4)) | Rep = 26(±1.4)/(1+[(3)×(Conc/1.70)5.3(±1.4)] |
| (0.96–1.28) | (0.96–1.27) | (1.45–1.94) | R = 0.73 | R = 0.73 | R = 0.73 | |
| E89 | 1.51 | 2.15 | 3.07 | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+[(0.33)×(Conc/1.51)3.3(±1.0)] | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+(Conc/2.15)3.3(±1.0)) | Rep = 19(±1.3)/(1+[(3)×(Conc/3.07)3.3(±1.0)] |
| (1.13–1.89) | (1.77–2.53) | (2.01–4.12) | R = 0.60 | R = 0.60 | R = 0.60 |
Rep – Total number of neonates.
Conc – Concentration of NaCl.