| Literature DB >> 23990814 |
Rong Zhang1, Tomoaki Ichijo, Yan-Yan Hu, Hong-Wei Zhou, Nobuyasu Yamaguchi, Masao Nasu, Gong-Xiang Chen.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In Zhejiang Province, there are several highly developed cities near the coast and several relatively under-developed mountain areas. Analysis of the composition of bacteria isolated from patients as well as their antibiotic resistance profile from various areas of this province, and tracing of such data year-by-year, will help to delineate the bacterial resistance profile of these areas and to understand how the stage of socio-economical development impacts on the composition of clinical micro-flora and their resistance profile.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacteriaceae; area distribution; carbapenems; long-term resistant surveillance
Year: 2012 PMID: 23990814 PMCID: PMC3744663 DOI: 10.3402/mehd.v23i0.11609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Ecol Health Dis ISSN: 0891-060X
Distribution of clinical isolates in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2009
| No. | 2000 | No. of strains | 2001 | No. of strains | 2002 | No. of strains | 2003 | No. of strains | 2004 | No. of strains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 773 |
| 1996 |
| 2156 |
| 2201 |
| 4388 |
| 2 |
| 767 |
| 1782 |
| 1880 |
| 2025 |
| 2850 |
| 3 |
| 501 |
| 1084 |
| 1190 |
| 1695 |
| 2594 |
| 4 |
| 463 |
| 984 |
| 1069 |
| 1585 |
| 2466 |
| 5 |
| 399 |
| 941 |
| 1035 |
| 1387 |
| 2465 |
| 6 |
| 336 |
| 770 |
| 811 |
| 1386 |
| 1922 |
| 7 |
| 235 |
| 456 |
| 690 |
| 1123 |
| 1377 |
| 8 |
| 228 |
| 428 |
| 621 |
| 792 |
| 1281 |
| 9 |
| 203 |
| 385 |
| 500 |
| 506 |
| 769 |
| 10 |
| 108 |
| 342 |
| 483 |
| 440 |
| 768 |
|
| ||||||||||
| No. | 2005 | No. of strains | 2006 | No. of strains | 2007 | No. of strains | 2008 | No. of strains | 2009 | No. of strains |
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 |
| 7225 |
| 9502 |
| 14667 |
| 28049 |
| 25897 |
| 2 |
| 5875 |
| 7819 |
| 9577 |
| 20892 |
| 24938 |
| 3 |
| 3438 |
| 4305 |
| 6161 |
| 9234 |
| 9472 |
| 4 |
| 3003 |
| 4058 |
| 5291 |
| 8080 |
| 8033 |
| 5 |
| 2829 |
| 2920 |
| 3951 |
| 6926 |
| 6954 |
| 6 |
| 2394 |
| 2474 |
| 2880 |
| 4271 |
| 5155 |
| 7 |
| 1262 |
| 1732 |
| 2344 |
| 4040 |
| 5036 |
| 8 |
| 1260 |
| 1386 |
| 1942 |
| 3809 |
| 2997 |
| 9 |
| 1175 |
| 1138 |
| 1674 |
| 2193 |
| 2877 |
| 10 |
| 1132 |
| 990 |
| 1339 |
| 1962 |
| 1798 |
Fig. 1Distribution of clinically isolated Enterobacteriaceae in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2009.
Fig. 2Annual changes in the detection ratio of Enterobacteriaceae that produced ESBLs from clinically isolated Enterobacteriaceae.
Variation of antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from 2000 to 2009
| Resistance rate (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Antimicrobial agents | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total number of isolates | 501 | 1084 | 1190 | 1695 | 2594 | 3003 | 2920 | 3951 | 6926 | 6954 |
| Aztreonam | 23.5 | 15.3 | 25.0 | 21.0 | 35.0 | 46.1 | 48.5 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 51.4 |
| Cefepime | 10.3 | 12.1 | 32.8 | 19.7 | 35.3 | 46.7 | 47.0 | 52.7 | 52.1 | 49.4 |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | – | – | – | 2.4 | 4.8 | 10.3 | 8.3 | 4.8 | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Cefotaxime | 26.0 | 23.1 | 36.5 | 36.3 | 50.1 | 56.8 | 57.0 | 64.1 | 63.6 | 61.7 |
| Cefoxitin | 14.3 | 22.8 | 24.4 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 20.6 | 18.1 | 22.1 | 14.3 | 16.9 |
| Ceftazidime | 5.5 | 14.8 | 23.6 | 14.0 | 26.7 | 34.8 | 38.5 | 46.3 | 50.0 | 45.3 |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| Meropenem | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | – | – | – | 7.7 | 12.6 | 10.5 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 8.7 | 12.6 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total number of isolates | 399 | 941 | 1069 | 1387 | 2466 | 3438 | 4058 | 6161 | 8080 | 9472 |
| Aztreonam | 24.1 | 47.5 | 56.2 | 49.0 | 45.0 | 61.6 | 65.5 | 74.2 | 64.2 | 61.7 |
| Cefepime | 8.6 | 26.8 | 51.5 | 21.0 | 27.9 | 45.8 | 61.4 | 65.3 | 57.9 | 58.1 |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | – | – | – | 9.9 | 13.4 | 31.5 | 23.8 | 18.8 | 24.8 | 37.0 |
| Cefotaxime | 33.0 | 38.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | 49.7 | 67.8 | 69.8 | 74.4 | 70.7 | 63.0 |
| Cefoxitin | 22.2 | 27.6 | 35.8 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 26.6 | 33.9 | 32.4 | 27.5 | 32.0 |
| Ceftazidime | 23.9 | 27.3 | 46.9 | 34.6 | 42.9 | 54.2 | 58.7 | 69.3 | 60.1 | 58.4 |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 7.3 | 8.5 | 23.3 |
| Meropenem | – | – | – | 1.3 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 20.8 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | – | – | – | 28.1 | 40.8 | 43.7 | 47.0 | 46.1 | 38.6 | 49.0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total number of isolates | 235 | 342 | 483 | 506 | 768 | 803 | 943 | 1096 | 1358 | 1598 |
| Aztreonam | 62.5 | 58.6 | 53.2 | 60.3 | 55.2 | 66.1 | 57.6 | 51.6 | 50.7 | 48.8 |
| Cefepime | 24.5 | 27.5 | 44.2 | 29.8 | 32.6 | 41.4 | 31.3 | 33.2 | 27.1 | 25.1 |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | – | – | – | 6.1 | 12.4 | 25.3 | 18.5 | 9.4 | 18.7 | 13.6 |
| Cefotaxime | 57.4 | 65.0 | 65.5 | 43.5 | 57.9 | 66.9 | 51.9 | 53.9 | 49.3 | 46.8 |
| Cefoxitin | – | 92.7 | 95.9 | 89.3 | 83.9 | 89.4 | 95.5 | 94.8 | 96.0 | 94.5 |
| Ceftazidime | 47.9 | 53.9 | 51.7 | 56.0 | 53.7 | 58.0 | 48.8 | 44.9 | 48.5 | 49.5 |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 2.9 | 0 | 2.4 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 9.8 |
| Meropenem | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 5.1 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | – | – | 31.3 | 34.7 | 42.2 | 31.2 | 26.6 | 26.4 | 21.8 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total number of isolates | 19 | 33 | 59 | 44 | 187 | 551 | 1057 | 1674 | 3809 | 2997 |
| Aztreonam | – | – | – | – | 2.3 | 50.9 | 52.5 | 66.9 | 48.1 | 53.7 |
| Cefepime | – | – | – | – | – | 25.4 | 30.6 | 31.9 | 26.7 | 48.0 |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.1 | 11.3 | 21.5 | 16.7 | |
| Cefotaxime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44.3 | 45.9 | 60.0 | 48.2 | 49.6 |
| Cefoxitin | – | 10.0 | 50.0 | 28.6 | 43.5 | 61.9 | 60.2 | 60.1 | 67.8 | 62.9 |
| Ceftazidime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 15.6 | 7.9 | 12.0 | 26.4 |
| Imipenem | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48.7 | 54.9 | 34.2 | 24.1 | 18.3 |
| Meropenem | – | – | – | – | – | 59.3 | 40.7 | 28.2 | 20.2 | 10.4 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 27.6 | 35.2 | 33.7 | 30.3 | 25.1 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total number of isolates | 29 | 52 | 90 | 118 | 245 | 142 | 93 | 136 | 231 | 447 |
| Aztreonam | 0 | 33.3 | 43.5 | 25.0 | 28.6 | 34.3 | 31.6 | 56.0 | 48.3 | 50.0 |
| Cefepime | 0 | 20.0 | 22.7 | 25.0 | 13.0 | 28.6 | 27.8 | 36.0 | 37.9 | 31.8 |
| Cefoperazone-sulbactam | – | – | – | – | 13.0 | 10.0 | 6.4 | 19.1 | 20.0 | 15.9 |
| Cefotaxime | 28.7 | 25.0 | 37.5 | 33.3 | 46.0 | 35.7 | 36.4 | 42.1 | 35.3 | 56.5 |
| Cefoxitin | – | – | 85.7 | 78.5 | 69.6 | 86.4 | 83.3 | 88.9 | 91.2 | 93.8 |
| Ceftazidime | 30.0 | 35.7 | 41.4 | 25.0 | 32.8 | 25.0 | 36.9 | 48.0 | 41.4 | 45.7 |
| Imipenem | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 0 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 0 | 13.6 |
| Meropenem | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 0 | 13.1 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | – | – | – | – | 21.8 | 24.3 | 31.6 | 40.0 | 20.7 | 39.1 |
Fig. 3Annual changes in the resistance rate of various Enterobacteriaceae species against carbapenem from 2000 to 2009. (A) Imipenem, (B) meropenem.
Fig. 4Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from 10 areas in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2009. The year shown inside the area indicated the year when the first carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was identified from this area. The sign of different color shown in the area indicates the different carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae so far have been identified from this area.
Detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in different districts of Zhejiang Province
| District | Year of the earliest appeared carbapenem-resistant | Number of existing species of bacteria | Existing species of bacteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou district | In 2002, | 8 | |
| Jiaxing district | In 2007, | 4 |
|
| Ningbo district | In 2008, | 6 |
|
| Shaoxing district | In 2007, | 3 |
|
| Huzhou district | In 2008, | 2 |
|
| Taizhou district | In 2007, | 4 |
|
| Lishui district | In 2008, | 1 |
|
| Wenzhou district | In 2007, | 3 |
|
| Jinhua District | In 2007, | 3 |
|
| Quzhou district | In 2007, | 1 |
|
| Zhoushan district | In 2008, | 3 |
|
Fig. 5Resistant rates of E. coli (Panel A) and K. pneumoniae (Panel B) isolated from different areas of the province against imipenem (open bars) and meropenem (filled bars).