Literature DB >> 23990673

Estimated GFR reporting influences recommendations for dialysis initiation.

K Scott Brimble1, Rajnish Mehrotra, Marcello Tonelli, Carmel M Hawley, Clare Castledine, Stephen P McDonald, Vicki Levidiotis, Azim S Gangji, Darin J Treleaven, Peter J Margetts, Michael Walsh.   

Abstract

Automated reporting of estimated GFR (eGFR) with serum creatinine measurement is now common. We surveyed nephrologists in four countries to determine whether eGFR reporting influences nephrologists' recommendations for dialysis initiation. Respondents were randomly allocated to receive a survey of four clinical vignettes that included either serum creatinine concentration only or serum creatinine and the corresponding eGFR. For each scenario, the respondent was asked to rank his or her likelihood of recommending dialysis initiation on a modified 8-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("definitely not") to 8 ("definitely would"). Analysis of the 822 eligible responses received showed that the predicted likelihood of recommending dialysis increased by 0.55 points when eGFR was reported (95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.76), and this effect was larger for eGFRs >5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (P<0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that physicians who had been in practice ≥13 years were more affected by eGFR reporting (P=0.03). These results indicate that eGFR reporting modestly increases the likelihood that dialysis is recommended, and physicians should be aware of this effect when assessing patients with severe CKD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23990673      PMCID: PMC3810082          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013010035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  18 in total

1.  Reporting estimated GFR: a laboratory perspective.

Authors:  W Greg Miller
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on detection, monitoring and management of patients with CKD.

Authors:  Mark S MacGregor; Maarten W Taal
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Screening for chronic kidney disease in Australia: a pilot study in the community and workplace.

Authors:  Timothy H Mathew; Olivia Corso; Marie Ludlow; Adam Boyle; Alan Cass; Steven J Chadban; Beres Joyner; Mark Shephard; Tim Usherwood
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.545

4.  A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis.

Authors:  Bruce A Cooper; Pauline Branley; Liliana Bulfone; John F Collins; Jonathan C Craig; Margaret B Fraenkel; Anthony Harris; David W Johnson; Joan Kesselhut; Jing Jing Li; Grant Luxton; Andrew Pilmore; David J Tiller; David C Harris; Carol A Pollock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nephrology visits and health care resource use before and after reporting estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Jianguo Zhang; Braden J Manns; Matthew T James; Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Scott W Klarenbach; Bruce F Culleton; Richard Krause; Laurel Thorlacius; Arsh K Jain; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley A Stevens; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Stephen Hendriksen; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Impact of estimated GFR reporting on patients, clinicians, and health-care systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yoan K Kagoma; Matthew A Weir; Arthur V Iansavichus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Ayub Akbari; Uptal D Patel; Amit X Garg; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jiannong Liu; Zhi Huang; David T Gilbertson; Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 9.  End-stage renal disease in the United States: an update from the United States Renal Data System.

Authors:  Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  When laboratories report estimated glomerular filtration rates in addition to serum creatinines, nephrology consults increase.

Authors:  Arsh K Jain; Ian McLeod; Cindy Huo; Meaghan S Cuerden; Ayub Akbari; Marcello Tonelli; Carl van Walraven; Rob R Quinn; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Matt J Oliver; Ping Li; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  4 in total

1.  The association of eGFR reporting with the timing of dialysis initiation.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Paul Komenda; Claudio Rigatto; Brett Hiebert; Navdeep Tangri
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Timing of Dialysis Initiation: What Has Changed Since IDEAL?

Authors:  Matthew B Rivara; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Trends in Timing of Dialysis Initiation within Versus Outside the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Margaret K Yu; Ann M O'Hare; Adam Batten; Christine A Sulc; Emily L Neely; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Variation in the level of eGFR at dialysis initiation across dialysis facilities and geographic regions.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Braden Manns; Allison Dart; Brett Hiebert; Joanne Kappel; Paul Komenda; Anita Molzahn; David Naimark; Sharon Nessim; Claudio Rigatto; Steven Soroka; Michael Zappitelli; Navdeep Tangri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 8.237

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.