Literature DB >> 23990501

2012 AAPS National Biotech Conference Open Forum: a perspective on the current state of immunogenicity prediction and risk management.

Manoj Rajadhyaksha1, Meena Subramanyam, Bonnie Rup.   

Abstract

The immunogenicity profile of a biotherapeutic is determined by multiple product-, process- or manufacturing-, patient- and treatment-related factors and the bioanalytical methodology used to monitor for immunogenicity. This creates a complex situation that limits direct correlation of individual factors to observed immunogenicity rates. Therefore, mechanistic understanding of how these factors individually or in concert could influence the overall incidence and clinical risk of immunogenicity is crucial to provide the best benefit/risk profile for a given biotherapeutic in a given indication and to inform risk mitigation strategies. Advances in the field of immunogenicity have included development of best practices for monitoring anti-drug antibody development, categorization of risk factors contributing to immunogenicity, development of predictive tools, and development of effective strategies for risk management and mitigation. Thus, the opportunity to ask "where we are now and where we would like to go from here?" was the main driver for organizing an Open Forum on Improving Immunogenicity Risk Prediction and Management, conducted at the 2012 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' (AAPS) National Biotechnology Conference in San Diego. The main objectives of the Forum include the following: to understand the nature of immunogenicity risk factors, to identify analytical tools used and animal models and management strategies needed to improve their predictive value, and finally to identify collaboration opportunities to improve the reliability of risk prediction, mitigation, and management. This meeting report provides the Forum participant's and author's perspectives on the barriers to advancing this field and recommendations for overcoming these barriers through collaborative efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23990501      PMCID: PMC3787208          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-013-9520-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  2 in total

1.  Monitoring drug safety with registries: useful components of postmarketing pharmacovigilance systems.

Authors:  Cameron D Willis; John J McNeil; Peter A Cameron; Louise E Phillips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Authors:  Jean G Sathish; Swaminathan Sethu; Marie-Christine Bielsky; Lolke de Haan; Neil S French; Karthik Govindappa; James Green; Christopher E M Griffiths; Stephen Holgate; David Jones; Ian Kimber; Jonathan Moggs; Dean J Naisbitt; Munir Pirmohamed; Gabriele Reichmann; Jennifer Sims; Meena Subramanyam; Marque D Todd; Jan Willem Van Der Laan; Richard J Weaver; B Kevin Park
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 112.288

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.