Literature DB >> 23989746

Measurement of long-term outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.

Y Z Al-Tamimi1, M Guilfoyle, H Seeley, R J Laing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Myelopathy Disability Index and the Neck Disability Index are widely used to assess outcome in cervical spine surgery. Short Form (SF) 36 is a generic measure of health which can be used to measure health gains across a wide variety of conditions. The aim of the current study is to assess long-term outcomes using these measures in a cohort of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
METHODS: Cohort study with prospective data collection. Patients with CSM being offered decompressive surgery were asked to complete a set of generic and condition-specific outcome measures. This was repeated post-operatively at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months. SF-36 was used as a generic outcome measure and the Myelopathy Index, Neck Disability Score and visual analogue scores for arm, neck and hand pain, paraesthesia and dysthaesia were used as condition-specific outcome measures.
RESULTS: Significant improvements in all outcome measures were seen in 70% of the cohort. For SF-36, pre-operative scores were lower than age-matched controls in all domains and significant improvements were seen 3 months following surgery. This improvement in outcome was maintained at 5 years follow-up in approximately two-thirds of those with initial improvement.
CONCLUSION: We have used generic and condition-specific outcome measures of health and shown that in patients with CSM treated surgically, up to 70% can expect improvement in their quality of life. These outcome measures are easy to collect and provide objective evidence of changes in quality of life and disability and can help quantify the potential health gains that can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23989746      PMCID: PMC3886505          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2965-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  Outcomes measurement: a report from the front.

Authors:  R Geigle; S B Jones
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Development of a functional scoring system for rheumatoid arthritis patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  A T Casey; J M Bland; H A Crockard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, depression, and anxiety: a cohort analysis of 89 patients.

Authors:  Michael R Stoffman; Mark S Roberts; Joseph T King
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Joseph T King; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Multimodal assessment after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Joseph T King; John J Moossy; Joel Tsevat; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-05

6.  Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.

Authors:  M Latimer; N Haden; H M Seeley; R J Laing
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Quality of life assessment after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative evaluation of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref.

Authors:  Sumit Thakar; Solomon Christopher; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-10

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

9.  Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Joseph T King; Kathleen A McGinnis; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Preference-based quality of life measurement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Joseph T King; Joel Tsevat; John J Moossy; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests.

Authors:  Hugues Pascal Moussellard; Alain Meyer; David Biot; Frédéric Khiami; Elhadi Sariali
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the prediction of outcome following surgical intervention in 93 patients using T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans.

Authors:  Hatem M I Salem; Khalid M I Salem; Filip Burget; Raj Bommireddy; Zdenek Klezl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Extensive laminectomy for multilevel cervical stenosis with ligamentum flavum hypertrophy: more than 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Zhiyang Li; Yuan Xue; Dong He; Yanming Tang; Huairong Ding; Yi Wang; Yaqi Zong; Ying Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is the Neck Disability Index an Appropriate Measure for Changes in Physical Function After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Authors:  Dhruv K C Goyal; Hamadi A Murphy; Douglas A Hollern; Srikanth N Divi; Kristen Nicholson; Christie Stawicki; I David Kaye; Gregory D Schroeder; Barrett I Woods; Mark F Kurd; Jeffrey A Rihn; D Greg Anderson; Christopher K Kepler; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristen E Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

5.  Assessment of health-related quality of life using the SF-36 in Chinese cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients after surgery and its consistency with neurological function assessment: a cohort study.

Authors:  Yilong Zhang; Feifei Zhou; Yu Sun
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davies; Oliver Mowforth; Iwan Sadler; Bizhan Aarabi; Brian Kwon; Shekar Kurpad; James S Harrop; Jefferson R Wilson; Robert Grossman; Michael G Fehlings; Mark Kotter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A comparison of radiological descriptions of spinal cord compression with quantitative measures, and their role in non-specialist clinical management.

Authors:  Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell; Bryn Hilton; Benjamin M Davies; Aria Nouri; Peter J Hutchinson; Daniel J Scoffings; Richard J Mannion; Rikin Trivedi; Ivan Timofeev; John R Crawford; Douglas Hay; Rodney J Laing; Mark R N Kotter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Preoperative Neck Disability Severity Limits Extent of Postoperative Improvement Following Cervical Spine Procedures.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Association of Depression and Cervical Spondylosis: A Nationwide Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shih-Yi Lin; Fung-Chang Sung; Cheng-Li Lin; Li-Wei Chou; Chung-Y Hsu; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Authors:  Feifei Zhou; Shuyang Li; Yilong Zhang; Yanbin Zhao; Kevin L Ju; Fengshan Zhang; Shengfa Pan; Yu Sun
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.