INTRODUCTION: Solitary bone plasmacytoma (SP) is a rare diagnosis for which the primary treatment is local radiotherapy. There is no established consensus suggesting a total spondylectomy in spinal SP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report the case of a 43-year-old woman with solitary plasmacytoma of the lumbar spine treated with complete vertebral resection. Radiographs, CT scan and MRI showed a single osteolytic lesion of the third lumbar vertebra. Further diagnostics following recommended algorithm for tumour screening were negative. Two times, biopsy showed no histological pathologies. Due to the instability of the spine with suspicious unknown lesion, we decided to perform a dorsal lumbar approach and instrumentation with complete resection of the posterior parts to prepare for a complete resection if mandatory. Resamples were taken and the bone surfaces sealed. Consecutive findings were positive for plasma cell infiltration of the respective vertebra, however not on the first pass, but after diagnostic pathological reference. Surgery was completed by total spondylectomy. Reference histological findings with restaging and cytogenetic risk analysis confirmed a non-high-risk solitary bone plasmacytoma, and the patient was scheduled for localized radiotherapy with 40 Gy. RESULTS: Follow-up examinations (53 months) showed no local recurrence or disease progression. DISCUSSION: There is no consensus in the literature regarding appropriate surgical approach and perioperative strategies in the treatment of solitary plasmacytoma. The finding of a solitary plasmacytoma of the spine was the determining factor for our decision to perform radical surgery with subsequent radiotherapy. The rationale for the chosen approach was to minimize the risk of local recurrence and to avoid conversion into multiple myeloma. The follow-up with 53 months is limited. However, discussion remains, if radical surgery in addition to local radiotherapy could be an alternative therapeutic approach depending on paraclinical parameters, age and cytogenetic risk analysis.
INTRODUCTION: Solitary bone plasmacytoma (SP) is a rare diagnosis for which the primary treatment is local radiotherapy. There is no established consensus suggesting a total spondylectomy in spinal SP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report the case of a 43-year-old woman with solitary plasmacytoma of the lumbar spine treated with complete vertebral resection. Radiographs, CT scan and MRI showed a single osteolytic lesion of the third lumbar vertebra. Further diagnostics following recommended algorithm for tumour screening were negative. Two times, biopsy showed no histological pathologies. Due to the instability of the spine with suspicious unknown lesion, we decided to perform a dorsal lumbar approach and instrumentation with complete resection of the posterior parts to prepare for a complete resection if mandatory. Resamples were taken and the bone surfaces sealed. Consecutive findings were positive for plasma cell infiltration of the respective vertebra, however not on the first pass, but after diagnostic pathological reference. Surgery was completed by total spondylectomy. Reference histological findings with restaging and cytogenetic risk analysis confirmed a non-high-risk solitary bone plasmacytoma, and the patient was scheduled for localized radiotherapy with 40 Gy. RESULTS: Follow-up examinations (53 months) showed no local recurrence or disease progression. DISCUSSION: There is no consensus in the literature regarding appropriate surgical approach and perioperative strategies in the treatment of solitary plasmacytoma. The finding of a solitary plasmacytoma of the spine was the determining factor for our decision to perform radical surgery with subsequent radiotherapy. The rationale for the chosen approach was to minimize the risk of local recurrence and to avoid conversion into multiple myeloma. The follow-up with 53 months is limited. However, discussion remains, if radical surgery in addition to local radiotherapy could be an alternative therapeutic approach depending on paraclinical parameters, age and cytogenetic risk analysis.
Authors: Richard Soutar; Helen Lucraft; Graham Jackson; Anthony Reece; Jenny Bird; Eric Low; Diana Samson Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: R W Tsang; M K Gospodarowicz; M Pintilie; A Bezjak; W Wells; D C Hodgson; A K Stewart Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel M Sciubba; Rafael De la Garza Ramos; C Rory Goodwin; Risheng Xu; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jean-Paul Wolinsky Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-06-04 Impact factor: 3.134