Literature DB >> 23989533

Beta-blockade and A1-adenosine receptor agonist effects on atrial fibrillatory rate and atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Valentina D A Corino1, Fredrik Holmqvist, Luca T Mainardi, Pyotr G Platonov.   

Abstract

AIMS: Reduced irregularity of RR intervals in permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with poor outcome. It is not fully understood, however, whether modification of atrioventricular (AV) conduction using rate-control drugs affects RR variability and irregularity measures. We aimed at assessing whether atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR) and variability and irregularity of the ventricular rate are modified by a selective A1-adenosine receptor agonist tecadenoson, beta-blocker esmolol, and their combination. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (age 58 ± 7 years, 13 men) with AF were randomly assigned to either 75, 150, or 300 μg intravenous tecadenoson. Tecadenoson was administered alone (Dose Period 1) and in combination (Dose Period 2) with esmolol (100 μg/kg/min for 10 min then 50 μg/kg/min for 50 min). Heart rate (HR) and AFR were estimated for every 10 min long recording segment. Similarly, for every 10 min segment, the variability of RR intervals was assessed, as standard deviation, pNN20, pNN50, pNN80, and the root of the mean squared differences of successive RR intervals, and irregularity was assessed by non-linear measures such as regularity index (R) and approximate entropy. A marked decrease in HR was observed after both tecadenoson injections, whereas almost no changes could be seen in the AFR. The variability parameters were increased after the first tecadenoson bolus injection. In contrast, the irregularity parameters did not change after tecadenoson. When esmolol was infused, all the variability parameters further increased.
CONCLUSION: Modification of AV node conduction can increase RR variability but does not affect regularity of RR intervals or AFR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation frequency; Irregularity; RR series; Tecadenoson; Variability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23989533     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Use And Limitations Of Non-Invasive Electrophysiological Tests In Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Valentina D A Corino; Luca T Mainardi; Frida Sandberg; Leif Sörnmo; Pyotr G Platonov
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Autonomic influence on atrial fibrillatory process: head-up and head-down tilting.

Authors:  Sten Östenson; Valentina D A Corino; Jonas Carlsson; Pyotr G Platonov
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Relationship between HRV measurements and demographic and clinical variables in a population of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Carmelo Buttà; Antonino Tuttolomondo; Alessandra Casuccio; Rossella Petrantoni; Giuseppe Miceli; Francesco Cuttitta; Antonio Pinto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Inverse Correlation between the Atrial Fibrillatory Rate and the Ventricular Repolarization Time: Observations at Baseline and after an Intravenous Infusion of a Combined Potassium and Sodium Current Blocker.

Authors:  Nils Edvardsson; Maria Aunes; Lars Frison; Anders R Berggren
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.