Literature DB >> 2398941

The diagnosis of infections associated with acrylic cranioplasties.

E C Benzel1, K Thammavaram, L Kesterson.   

Abstract

Fifty-two methylmethacrylate cranioplasties were performed on forty-seven patients over a five year period. Two cranioplasties became infected and required removal. The overall infection rate for methylmethacrylate cranioplasty was thus 2/52 or 3.8%. Both of these patients had bifrontal cranioplasties involving both orbital rims and the frontal sinus. The infection rate for those cranioplasties involving the frontal sinus was 2 of 9 or 22%. None of the 43 cranioplasties not involving the frontal sinus became infected. Ten patients in this series had postoperative CT scans. Gas within the non-infected methylmethacrylate could simulate infection, making it difficult to diagnose cranioplasty infections by CT. Although certain CT changes, such as epidural air and soft tissue swelling, may be observed only with infected cranioplasties, the clinical picture is the only truly reliable indicator of infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2398941     DOI: 10.1007/bf00588566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  Gas bubbles in polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty simulating abscesses: CT appearance.

Authors:  T O Mason; B S Rose; J H Goodman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  CT appearance of a prosthetic methyl methacrylate mass mistaken for abscess.

Authors:  J Beynon; L Slonim; Z S Kiss; C Morris; L Lau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A new method of cranioplasty.

Authors:  A H Capanna
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1980-11
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Stereolithography for posterior fossa cranioplasty.

Authors:  C Agner; M Dujovny; R Evenhouse; F T Charbel; L Sadler
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

Authors:  Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-18

3.  Infection of cranioplasty seen twenty years later.

Authors:  Mehmet Sabri Gürbüz; Ozgur Celik; Mehmet Zafer Berkman
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-11-30

4.  Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.

Authors:  J Sundseth; A Sundseth; J Berg-Johnsen; W Sorteberg; K-F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Never say never again: A bone graft infection due to a hornet sting, thirty-nine years after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Rosario Maugeri; Roberto G Giammalva; Francesca Graziano; Luigi Basile; Carlo Gulì; Antonella Giugno; Domenico G Iacopino
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.