Juliana Barr1, Pratik P Pandharipande. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. barrj@stanford.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2013, the American College of Critical Care Medicine published a revised version of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. The guidelines included an ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle designed to facilitate implementation of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. DESIGN: Review article. SETTING: Multispecialty critical care units. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: This article describes: 1) the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle in more detail, linking pain, sedation/agitation, and delirium management in an integrated and interdisciplinary fashion; 2) pain, agitation, and delirium implementation strategies; and 3) the potential synergistic benefits of linking pain, agitation, and delirium management strategies to other evidence-based ICU practices, including spontaneous breathing trials, ICU early mobility programs, and ICU sleep hygiene programs, in order to improve ICU patient outcomes and to reduce costs of care. RESULTS: Linking the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium management strategies with spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, and early mobility and sleep hygiene programs is associated with significant improvements in ICU patient outcomes and reductions in their costs of care. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 ICU pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines provide critical care providers with an evidence-based, integrated, and interdisciplinary approach to managing pain, agitation/sedation, and delirium. The ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle provides a framework for facilitating implementation of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. Widespread implementation of the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle is likely to result in large-scale improvements in ICU patient outcomes and significant reductions in costs.
OBJECTIVE: In 2013, the American College of Critical Care Medicine published a revised version of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. The guidelines included an ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle designed to facilitate implementation of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. DESIGN: Review article. SETTING: Multispecialty critical care units. PATIENTS: Adult ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: This article describes: 1) the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle in more detail, linking pain, sedation/agitation, and delirium management in an integrated and interdisciplinary fashion; 2) pain, agitation, and delirium implementation strategies; and 3) the potential synergistic benefits of linking pain, agitation, and delirium management strategies to other evidence-based ICU practices, including spontaneous breathing trials, ICU early mobility programs, and ICU sleep hygiene programs, in order to improve ICU patient outcomes and to reduce costs of care. RESULTS: Linking the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium management strategies with spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, and early mobility and sleep hygiene programs is associated with significant improvements in ICU patient outcomes and reductions in their costs of care. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 ICU pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines provide critical care providers with an evidence-based, integrated, and interdisciplinary approach to managing pain, agitation/sedation, and delirium. The ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle provides a framework for facilitating implementation of the pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. Widespread implementation of the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium care bundle is likely to result in large-scale improvements in ICU patient outcomes and significant reductions in costs.
Authors: Phillip J Schulte; David O Warner; David P Martin; Atousa Deljou; Michelle M Mielke; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Toby N Weingarten; Matthew A Warner; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Andrew C Hanson; Darrell R Schroeder; Juraj Sprung Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Mark van den Boogaard; Arjen J C Slooter; Roger J M Brüggemann; Lisette Schoonhoven; Albertus Beishuizen; J Wytze Vermeijden; Danie Pretorius; Jan de Koning; Koen S Simons; Paul J W Dennesen; Peter H J Van der Voort; Saskia Houterman; J G van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Anna Besselink; Lieuwe S Hofstra; Peter E Spronk; Walter van den Bergh; Dirk W Donker; Malaika Fuchs; Attila Karakus; M Koeman; Mirella van Duijnhoven; Gerjon Hannink Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kalgi Mody; Savneet Kaur; Elizabeth A Mauer; Linda M Gerber; Bruce M Greenwald; Gabrielle Silver; Chani Traube Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joel N Berning; Armeen D Poor; Sarah M Buckley; Komal R Patel; David J Lederer; Nathan E Goldstein; Daniel Brodie; Matthew R Baldwin Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-08
Authors: Leanne M Boehm; Brenda T Pun; Joanna L Stollings; Timothy D Girard; Peter Rock; Catherine L Hough; S Jean Hsieh; Babar A Khan; Robert L Owens; Gregory A Schmidt; Susan Smith; E Wesley Ely Journal: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.072