Literature DB >> 23988874

GM crop co-existence: a question of choice, not prejudice.

Daniel Pearsall1.   

Abstract

The rapid uptake of biotech crops around the world demonstrates not only strong producer and consumer demand for the technology and its products, but also that where regulatory regimes function effectively and markets are allowed to operate as normal, co-existence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM supply chains is readily achievable. However, the polarized debate over GMOs within the European Union over the past 15 years has resulted in a highly politicized and progressively impractical approach to the issue of GM crop co-existence, which in itself has become a further barrier to the technology's development. This article argues that co-existence should not be treated as a pro- or anti-GM issue, and that the aim of co-existence measures should be to permit consumer choice and freedom to operate whatever the production method involved. It suggests that supply chain-based solutions to co-existence, rather than Government prescription, offer the most pragmatic and flexible response to the commercial realities of servicing differentiated market demands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GM crops; public policy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23988874     DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.26303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  2 in total

1.  Coexistence of genetically modified seed production and organic farming in Chile.

Authors:  M A Sánchez; H Campos
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 2.  Transgene flow: facts, speculations and possible countermeasures.

Authors:  Gerhart U Ryffel
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.074

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.