Literature DB >> 23988759

A neuroimaging investigation of attribute framing and individual differences.

Kevin B Murch1, Daniel C Krawczyk2.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate the neural basis of framing effects. We tested the reflexive and reflective systems model of social cognition as it relates to framing. We also examined the relationships among frame susceptibility, intelligence and personality measures. Participants evaluated whether personal attributes applied to themselves from multiple perspectives and in positive and negative frames. Participants rated whether each statement was descriptive or not and endorsed positive frames more than negative frames. Individual differences on frame decisions enabled us to form high and low frame susceptibility groups. Endorsement of frame-consistent attributes was associated with personality factors, cognitive reflection and intelligence. Reflexive brain regions were associated with positive frames while reflective areas were associated with negative frames. Region of Interest analyses showed that frame-inconsistent responses were associated with increased activation within reflective cognitive control regions including the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsomedial PFC and left ventrolateral PFC. Frame-consistent responses were associated with increased activation in the right orbitofrontal cortex. These results demonstrate that individual differences in frame susceptibility influence personal attribute evaluations. Overall, this study clarifies the neural correlates of the reflective and reflexive systems of social cognition as applied to decisions about social attributions.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; fMRI; framing effects; individual differences; rationality; social evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23988759      PMCID: PMC4187265          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  55 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2003-09

Review 2.  The cognition and neuroscience of relational reasoning.

Authors:  Daniel C Krawczyk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition.

Authors:  Ajay B Satpute; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking.

Authors:  Arnaud D'Argembeau; Perrine Ruby; Fabienne Collette; Christian Degueldre; Evelyne Balteau; André Luxen; Pierre Maquet; Eric Salmon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Who am I? How do I look? Neural differences in self-identity in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Carrie J McAdams; Daniel C Krawczyk
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Hierarchical cognitive control deficits following damage to the human frontal lobe.

Authors:  David Badre; Joshua Hoffman; Jeffrey W Cooney; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Self responses along cingulate cortex reveal quantitative neural phenotype for high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Pearl H Chiu; M Amin Kayali; Kenneth T Kishida; Damon Tomlin; Laura G Klinger; Mark R Klinger; P Read Montague
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Associative learning of social value.

Authors:  Timothy E J Behrens; Laurence T Hunt; Mark W Woolrich; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The decision to engage cognitive control is driven by expected reward-value: neural and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Matthew L Dixon; Kalina Christoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reason's Enemy Is Not Emotion: Engagement of Cognitive Control Networks Explains Biases in Gain/Loss Framing.

Authors:  Rosa Li; David V Smith; John A Clithero; Vinod Venkatraman; R McKell Carter; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Attentional and emotional brain response to message framing in context of green marketing.

Authors:  Muhammad Zubair; Xiaoyi Wang; Sidra Iqbal; Muhammad Awais; Ruining Wang
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-09-23

3.  Influential Cognitive Processes on Framing Biases in Aging.

Authors:  Alison M Perez; Jeffrey Scott Spence; L D Kiel; Erin E Venza; Sandra B Chapman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-11

4.  Message framing and self-conscious emotions help to understand pro-environment consumer purchase intention: an ERP study.

Authors:  Muhammad Zubair; Sidra Iqbal; Sardar Muhammad Usman; Muhammad Awais; Ruining Wang; Xiaoyi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.