OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of margin sampling on local recurrence in patients with pT1-2 pN0 conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on margin sampling, 126 cases were divided into group 1 (margins sampled from the glossectomy specimen only), group 2 (with revision of glossectomy margins), and group 3 (margins primarily sampled from the tumor bed). RESULTS: The probability of local progression-free survival at 3years was .90, .76 and .73 (p=.0389) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Groups differed by frequency of positive glossectomy specimen margins (p=<.0001) and by the average distance from carcinoma to the closest margin (4.5, 2.4, and 3.0mm for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=.0009). Tumor bed margin status (positive vs. negative) and other parameters (e.g., pattern and depth of invasion) did not correlate with local recurrence. Status of the glossectomy specimen margins did correlate with outcome. A positive glossectomy margin conferred a relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1 - 6.3) for local recurrence. A proportional hazards regression model for margin width found a hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI=.57-.98) comparable to a 33% decrease in risk of local recurrence for an increase of 1mm of margin width (p=.0271). CONCLUSIONS: Status of the glossectomy specimen margins rather than that of tumor bed margins was prognostically relevant. Reliance on tumor bed margins appears to be associated with worse local control, perhaps due to the narrower initial resection.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of margin sampling on local recurrence in patients with pT1-2 pN0 conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on margin sampling, 126 cases were divided into group 1 (margins sampled from the glossectomy specimen only), group 2 (with revision of glossectomy margins), and group 3 (margins primarily sampled from the tumor bed). RESULTS: The probability of local progression-free survival at 3years was .90, .76 and .73 (p=.0389) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Groups differed by frequency of positive glossectomy specimen margins (p=<.0001) and by the average distance from carcinoma to the closest margin (4.5, 2.4, and 3.0mm for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=.0009). Tumor bed margin status (positive vs. negative) and other parameters (e.g., pattern and depth of invasion) did not correlate with local recurrence. Status of the glossectomy specimen margins did correlate with outcome. A positive glossectomy margin conferred a relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1 - 6.3) for local recurrence. A proportional hazards regression model for margin width found a hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI=.57-.98) comparable to a 33% decrease in risk of local recurrence for an increase of 1mm of margin width (p=.0271). CONCLUSIONS: Status of the glossectomy specimen margins rather than that of tumor bed margins was prognostically relevant. Reliance on tumor bed margins appears to be associated with worse local control, perhaps due to the narrower initial resection.
Authors: Alhadi Almangush; Ibrahim O Bello; Ricardo D Coletta; Antti A Mäkitie; Laura K Mäkinen; Joonas H Kauppila; Matti Pukkila; Jaana Hagström; Jussi Laranne; Ylermi Soini; Veli-Matti Kosma; Petri Koivunen; Natalie Kelner; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Reidar Grénman; Ilmo Leivo; Esa Läärä; Tuula Salo Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Marisa R Buchakjian; Timothy Ginader; Kendall K Tasche; Nitin A Pagedar; Brian J Smith; Steven M Sperry Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Bin Xu; Nora Katabi; Pablo H Montero; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong; Ronald A Ghossein; Snehal G Patel Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Mark W Kubik; Shaum Sridharan; Mark A Varvares; Dan P Zandberg; Heath D Skinner; Raja R Seethala; Simion I Chiosea Journal: Head Neck Pathol Date: 2020-03-02
Authors: Jessica H Maxwell; Lester D R Thompson; Margaret S Brandwein-Gensler; Bernhard G Weiss; Martin Canis; Bibianna Purgina; Arpan V Prabhu; Chi Lai; Yongli Shuai; William R Carroll; Anthony Morlandt; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Seungwon Kim; Jonas T Johnson; Robert L Ferris; Raja Seethala; Simion I Chiosea Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Arpan V Prabhu; Charles D Sturgis; Chi Lai; Jessica H Maxwell; Mihai Merzianu; Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Bibianna Purgina; Lester D R Thompson; Madalina Tuluc; Xiu Yang; Raja R Seethala; Robert L Ferris; Simion I Chiosea Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: P Horwich; C MacKay; M Bullock; S M Taylor; R Hart; J Trites; L Geldenhuys; B Williams; M H Rigby Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-06-21