Literature DB >> 23988424

Peroneal nerve entrapment at the fibular head: outcomes of neurolysis.

R Maalla1, M Youssef, N Ben Lassoued, M A Sebai, H Essadam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common peroneal nerve (CPN) entrapment at the fibular head is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome at the lower limbs. Motor deficits predominate and the risk of persistent functional impairment is the main concern. The objective was to evaluate outcomes of neurolysis and to evaluate the benefits of performing surgery early.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 15 patients (mean age, 32 years) treated with neurolysis. The diagnosis was idiopathic CPN entrapment in ten patients, indirect nerve injury with CPN paralysis due to an ankle injury in three patients, and postural CPN compression in two patients. Mean time to management was 7 months (range, 2-18 months).
RESULTS: Mean follow-up after neurolysis was 42 months (range, 25 to 62 months). The outcome was considered excellent in seven cases, good in five cases, and fair in three cases. Mean time to functional recovery was 2.5 months (range, 2 weeks to 6 months). Of the ten patients with idiopathic CPN entrapment syndrome, nine had excellent or good outcomes. The three patients with fair outcomes had ankle injuries or polyneuropathy. DISCUSSION: Spontaneous recovery can take time and remain incomplete. We prefer to perform surgery between the third and fourth months in patients with persistent symptoms or incomplete recovery, even in forms confined to sensory dysfunction documented by electrophysiological testing. Time to recovery is shorter after surgical decompression than with rehabilitation therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common peroneal nerve; Compression; Nerve entrapment syndrome; Neurolysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23988424     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Interdisciplinary Management of Foot Drop.

Authors:  Anne Elisabeth Carolus; Michael Becker; Jeanne Cuny; Rüdiger Smektala; Kirsten Schmieder; Christopher Brenke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Repetitive Plantar Flexion (Provocation) Test for the Diagnosis of Intermittent Claudication due to Peroneal Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy: Case Report.

Authors:  Kyongsong Kim; Toyohiko Isu; Rinko Kokubo; Daijiro Morimoto; Shiro Kobayashi; Akio Morita
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2015-09-11

3.  Undiagnosed Peripheral Nerve Disease in Patients with Failed Lumbar Disc Surgery.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamauchi; Kyongsong Kim; Toyohiko Isu; Naotaka Iwamoto; Kazuyoshi Yamazaki; Juntaro Matsumoto; Masanori Isobe
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

4.  Common Peroneal Nerve Entrapment in the Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Lateral Lower Leg: A Report of 5 Cases.

Authors:  Aniek P M van Zantvoort; Maikel J M Setz; Adwin R Hoogeveen; Marc R M Scheltinga
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-17

5.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Open Common Peroneal Nerve Neurolysis in the Setting of Previous Posterior Schwannoma Removal.

Authors:  Benjamin Kerzner; Hasani W Swindell; Michael P Fice; Felicitas Allende; Zeeshan A Khan; Luc M Fortier; Alan T Blank; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-03-28

6.  Irreparable Radial Nerve Palsy Due to Delayed Diagnostic Management of a Giant Lipoma at the Proximal Forearm Resulting in a Triple Tendon Transfer Procedure: Case report and Brief Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ingo Schmidt
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-08-21

7.  A Cadaveric Study of the Distal Biceps Femoris Muscle in relation to the Normal and Variant Course of the Common Peroneal Nerve: A Possible Cause of Common Peroneal Entrapment Neuropathy.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Park; Jinseo Yang; Kwang-Rak Park; Tae Woo Kim; Taeyeong Kim; Suyeon Park; Battur Tsengel; Jaeho Cho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.