Literature DB >> 23988388

How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world.

David W Arathorn1, Scott B Stevenson, Qiang Yang, Pavan Tiruveedhula, Austin Roorda.   

Abstract

Eye motion, even during fixation, results in constant motion of the image of the world on our retinas. Vision scientists have long sought to understand the process by which we perceive the stable parts of the world as unmoving despite this instability and perceive the moving parts with realistic motion. We used an instrument capable of delivering visual stimuli with controlled motion relative to the retina at cone-level precision while capturing the subjects' percepts of stimulus motion with a matching task. We found that the percept of stimulus motion is more complex than conventionally thought. Retinal stimuli that move in a direction that is consistent with eye motion (i.e., opposite eye motion) appear stable even if the magnitude of that motion is amplified. The apparent stabilization diminishes for stimulus motions increasingly inconsistent with eye motion direction. Remarkably, we found that this perceived direction-contingent stabilization occurs separately for each separately moving pattern on the retina rather than for the image as a whole. One consequence is that multiple patterns that move at different rates relative to each other in the visual input are perceived as immobile with respect to each other, thereby disrupting our hyperacute sensitivity to target motion against a frame of reference. This illusion of relative stability has profound implications regarding the underlying visual mechanisms. Functionally, the system compensates retinal slip induced by eye motion without requiring an extremely precise optomotor signal and, at the same time, retains an exquisite sensitivity to an object's true motion in the world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive optics; eye tracking; motion perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23988388      PMCID: PMC4525302          DOI: 10.1167/13.10.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; D Hendry; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Finding the common bond: stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities.

Authors:  S P McKee; L Welch; D G Taylor; S F Bowne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider; B Bridgeman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity.

Authors:  E Kowler; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Frequency analysis of human involuntary eye movement.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1971-06

7.  Slow control with eccentric targets: evidence against a position-corrective model.

Authors:  J Epelboim; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; P Aitsebaomo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Displacement detection in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; F W Campbell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Dynamic visual stimulus presentation in an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Siddharth Poonja; Saumil Patel; Luis Henry; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  11 in total

1.  Closed-loop optical stabilization and digital image registration in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Jie Zhang; Koji Nozato; Kenichi Saito; David R Williams; Austin Roorda; Ethan A Rossi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Calibration-free sinusoidal rectification and uniform retinal irradiance in scanning light ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Lu Yin; Koji Nozato; Jie Zhang; Kenichi Saito; William H Merigan; David R Williams; Ethan A Rossi
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 3.  Brain Machine Interfaces for Vision Restoration: The Current State of Cortical Visual Prosthetics.

Authors:  Soroush Niketeghad; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  The unsteady eye: an information-processing stage, not a bug.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Suboptimal eye movements for seeing fine details.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Christy K Sheehy; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging: technology update.

Authors:  David Merino; Pablo Loza-Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26

7.  Where are you looking? Pseudogaze in afterimages.

Authors:  Daw-An Wu; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Benefits of retinal image motion at the limits of spatial vision.

Authors:  Kavitha Ratnam; Niklas Domdei; Wolf M Harmening; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The influence of retinal image motion on the perceptual grouping of temporally asynchronous stimuli.

Authors:  Adela S Y Park; Andrew B Metha; Phillip A Bedggood; Andrew J Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  High-acuity vision from retinal image motion.

Authors:  Alexander G Anderson; Kavitha Ratnam; Austin Roorda; Bruno A Olshausen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.