Literature DB >> 23987989

Temperature management during semen processing: Impact on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions.

M Schulze1, H Henning, K Rüdiger, U Wallner, D Waberski.   

Abstract

Freshly collected boar spermatozoa are sensitive to a fast reduction in temperature because of lipid phase transition and phase separation processes. Temperature management during semen processing may determine the quality of stored samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of isothermic and hypothermic semen processing protocols on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions. In the laboratory study, ejaculates (n = 12) were first diluted (1:1) with Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS) at 32 °C, then processed either with isothermic (32 °C) or hypothermic (21 °C) BTS, stored at 17 °C, and assessed on days 1, 3, and 6. Temperature curves showed that 150 minutes after the first dilution, semen doses of both groups reached the same temperature. Two-step hypothermic processing resulted in lower sperm motility on days 1 and 6 (P < 0.05). Concomitantly, hypothermally processed samples contained less membrane intact sperm on days 3 and 6 (P < 0.05). Using AndroStar Plus extender instead of BTS reduced the negative effect of hypothermic processing. In the field study, 15 semen samples from each of 23 European artificial insemination studs were evaluated as part of an external quality control program. Semen quality based on motility, membrane integrity, mitochondrial activity, and a thermoresistance test was higher for stations using one-step isothermic dilutions (n = 7) compared with artificial insemination centers using two-step hypothermic protocols (n = 16). Both studies show that chilling injury associated with hypothermic dilution results in lower quality of stored boar semen compared with isothermic dilution and that the type of semen extender affects the outcomes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boar; Extender; Quality assurance; Semen preservation; Temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987989     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  14 in total

Review 1.  Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen.

Authors:  Alfonso Lopez Rodriguez; Ann Van Soom; Ioannis Arsenakis; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-07-25

2.  Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality.

Authors:  Martin Schulze; Jana Schäfer; Christian Simmet; Markus Jung; Christoph Gabler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of a panel of spermatological methods for assessing reprotoxic compounds in multilayer semen plastic bags.

Authors:  M Schulze; F Schröter; M Jung; U Jakop
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative analysis of various step-dilution techniques on the quality of frozen Limousin bull semen.

Authors:  Ani Atul Arif; Tulus Maulana; Ekayanti Mulyawati Kaiin; Bambang Purwantara; Raden Iis Arifiantini; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-11-13

5.  Potential fertilizer of spermatozoa in porcine epididymal tail post-orchiectomy.

Authors:  Mariela Adriana Ydiaquez-Miranda; José Antonio Herrera-Barragán; Miguel González-Lozano; Alejandro Ávalos-Rodríguez
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 0.950

6.  Superoxide dismutase: a predicting factor for boar semen characteristics for short-term preservation.

Authors:  Maja Zakošek Pipan; Janko Mrkun; Marjan Kosec; Alenka Nemec Svete; Petra Zrimšek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effects of cationic antimicrobial peptides on liquid-preserved boar spermatozoa.

Authors:  Martin Schulze; Christof Junkes; Peter Mueller; Stephanie Speck; Karin Ruediger; Margitta Dathe; Karin Mueller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Determination of a cooling-rate frame for antibiotic-free preservation of boar semen at 5°C.

Authors:  Aline F L Paschoal; Anne-Marie Luther; Helen Jäkel; Kathi Scheinpflug; Kristin Mühldorfer; Fernando P Bortolozzo; Dagmar Waberski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low temperature preservation of porcine semen: influence of short antimicrobial lipopeptides on sperm quality and bacterial load.

Authors:  B Hensel; U Jakop; K Scheinpflug; K Mühldorfer; F Schröter; J Schäfer; K Greber; M Jung; M Schulze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Relevance of the Ejaculate Fraction and Dilution Method on Boar Sperm Quality during Processing and Conservation of Seminal Doses.

Authors:  Blanca Sebastián-Abad; Pedro José Llamas-López; Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.