Literature DB >> 23987898

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with signet ring cell features portends a poor prognosis.

Jonathan M Enlow1, Chadrick E Denlinger, Martha R Stroud, Jonathan S Ralston, Carolyn E Reed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell (SRC) features has been reported to be a poor prognostic marker in gastric and colorectal carcinomas. Although uncommon in the esophagus, SRC histology, interestingly, has been correlated with improved survival. Our impression has been that the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinomas with SRC features is increasing and is associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesize that patients with SRC histology present with more advanced disease, respond less well to induction therapy, and have decreased survival after resection compared with patients with non-SRC adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: The medical records of 151 consecutive patients who underwent resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction in a prospectively maintained database from 1998 to 2011 were reviewed. Outcomes of 23 patients (15%) with SRC histology (21 men, 2 women; average age, 66 years) were compared with 128 patients (85%) with non-SRC adenocarcinoma (116 men, 12 women; average age, 63 years). Overall survival, stage-specific survival, and response to induction therapy were evaluated. Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of 3-year survival.
RESULTS: SRC and non-SRC patients were evenly matched for clinical and tumor characteristics. Downstaging achieved with induction therapy was 13.3% (2 of 15) in SRC histology patients vs 67.1% (53 of 79) in non-SRC patients (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with SRC histology who did not respond well to induction treatment demonstrated strong trends toward a worse 3-year survival than patients with non-SRC adenocarcinoma (p = 0.084). The overall 3-year survival was 65.6% in patients without SRC histology vs 34.8% in those with SRC (p = 0.006). Patients with pathologic stage II or III and SRC histology had a 3-year survival of 27.3% compared with 57.4% in patients with non-SRC adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed SRC histology trended toward significance as an independent risk factor for poor survival (p = 0.060).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction and SRC histology respond less well to induction therapy and have decreased overall survival compared with patients with non-SRC histology.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987898     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Reetesh K Pai; Rish K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Pathologic complete response is not equivalent to cure in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Carr; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Skeletal muscle metastasis from signet ring cell esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ethan B Ludmir; Benjamin Robey; Evan Shelby; Sonya V Patel-Nguyen; Ahren Rittershaus; Michael R Contarino
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 4.  Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer: should we mind the gap?

Authors:  Yoku Hayakawa; Nilay Sethi; Antonia R Sepulveda; Adam J Bass; Timothy C Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Survival predictors associated with signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE): A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zihao Wan; Zhihao Huang; Liaobin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The clinicopathological features and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A 10-year retrospective study in China.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Xi Liu; Linggen Gao; Rong Wang; Dewei Gao; Dongyu Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; Feng-Wei Tan; Yu-Shun Gao; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yin Li; Xiang-Yang Yu; Hong Cheng; Chen-Guang Zhao; Ju-Wei Mu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Nomogram for predicting the overall survival of the patients with oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; Feng-Wei Tan; Yu-Shun Gao; Da-Li Wang; You-Sheng Mao; Jun Zhao; Yin Li; Xiang-Yang Yu; Hong Cheng; Chen-Guang Zhao; Ding Yang; Ju-Wei Mu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Clinical management of gastroesophageal junction tumors: past and recent evidences for the role of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Francesco Cellini; Alessio G Morganti; Francesco M Di Matteo; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.