Literature DB >> 23987518

Fresh semen quality in ejaculates produced by nocturnal emission in men with idiopathic anejaculation.

Xianghu Meng1, Longchang Fan, Jihong Liu, Tao Wang, Jun Yang, Junkai Wang, Shaogang Wang, Zhangqun Ye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of fresh semen samples collected by nocturnal emission (NE), penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), or electroejaculation (EEJ) from idiopathic anejaculation patients with those collected by masturbation from healthy control subjects.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study.
SETTING: University medical center. PATIENT(S): Ninety-one men with idiopathic anejaculation. INTERVENTION(S): NE, PVS, EEJ, computer-assisted semen analysis system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm volume, concentration, motility, and morphology. RESULT(S): The mean percentage of motile sperm in the NE group was 30.6% ± 3.5% (range 11.2%-50.9%), which is 1.5- and 1.9-fold higher than that of the PVS (20.5% ± 1.3%, range 6.9%-40.2%) and EEJ (16.1% ± 0.9%, range 3.7%-27.3%) groups, respectively. The percentage of sperm that have normal morphology in the NE group was 61.4% ± 4.8%, which is significantly higher than that in the PVS (38.4% ± 2.8%) and EEJ groups (29.5% ± 1.7%), respectively. However, compared with the healthy control group, the sperm motility and normal morphology in the NE, PVS, and EEJ groups were significantly lower. The sperm concentration in the NE group (149.4 ± 16.3 × 10(6) mL(-1)) was similar to that of the PVS group (143.8 ± 13.1 × 10(6) mL(-1)) but was higher than in the EEJ group (96.3 ± 8.6 × 10(6) mL(-1)) and lower than in the control group (225.0 ± 15.0 × 10(6) mL(-1)). Furthermore, the semen volume in the NE group (2.6 ± 0.2 mL) was lower than that of the control group (3.0 ± 0.1 mL). CONCLUSION(S): This study is the first to report on the quality of fresh semen obtained by NE in patients with idiopathic anejaculation. Sperm motility and normal morphology were higher in patients who collected sperm by NE than in those who collected sperm by PVS and EEJ.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Idiopathic anejaculation; electroejaculation; infertility; nocturnal emission; penile vibratory stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987518     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Two cases of psychogenic anejaculation patients got normal ejaculation ability after penile vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation.

Authors:  Rong Cong; Qijie Zhang; Yi Wang; Xianghu Meng; Zengjun Wang; Ninghong Song
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Delayed Ejaculation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Abdel-Hamid; Omar I Ali
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.400

3.  Electroejaculation combined with assisted reproductive technology in psychogenic anejaculation patients refractory to penile vibratory stimulation.

Authors:  Xianghu Meng; Longchang Fan; Tao Wang; Shaogang Wang; Zengjun Wang; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Male Sexual Dysfunctions in the Infertile Couple-Recommendations From the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM).

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Giulia Rastrelli; Josep Torremade; Giorgio I Russo; Amr Abdel Raheem; Anders Frey; Mikkel Fode; Mario Maggi; Yacov Reisman; Carlo Bettocchi; Giovanni Corona
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.491

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.