Literature DB >> 23986695

Growing a garden of neurons.

Rebekah C Evans1, Sridevi Polavaram.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational model; dendrites; growth algorithm; morphology; neural networks

Year:  2013        PMID: 23986695      PMCID: PMC3752441          DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neuroinform        ISSN: 1662-5196            Impact factor:   3.739


× No keyword cloud information.
Computational models of biologically realistic neuronal networks have advanced neuroscience in the past 20 years. With an ultimate goal of simulating a whole brain, these networks must become larger and more complex. However, a sheer massive number of neurons do not make a brain. Neurons are all different, with different kinetics, neurotransmitters, and importantly different morphologies. A network can be made by connecting copies of the same cell together, but this kind of homogenous network can only explain so much. Real neuronal networks are heterogeneous and are made up of neurons that follow both intrinsic and extrinsic cues to grow their unique dendritic arbors (Scott and Luo, 2001). In addition to homogenous and heterogeneous network models, hybrid network models have been implemented by creating a small heterogeneous network and replicating it to establish a larger network (Kozloski, 2011). However, modeling studies have shown that homogenous networks act differently than realistic heterogeneous ones (Mäki-Marttunen et al., 2011). Because computational neuronal networks need to grow larger to simulate complete brain regions, and because heterogeneity in a network is critical to modeling a realistic brain, algorithms for digitally generating neural morphologies are a necessary step toward this goal. A new paper by Memelli et al. (2013) joins the field of papers providing algorithms for growing digital neurons. Their algorithm can be used to build a network consisting of millions of neurons each with a unique morphology. The current models, L-Neuron (Ascoli et al., 2001), NeuGen2.0 (Wolf et al., 2013), NetMorph (Koene et al., 2009), and CD3X (Zubler and Douglas, 2009) have made great strides in advancing the process of generating digital neurons. These models are all publicly available, and can be used to generate large networks of neurons. Recently L-Neuron was used to generate a 0.5 million cell model of the dentate gyrus (Schneider et al., 2012). Each algorithm has its own specific advantages. NetMorph has a synapse-generating algorithm, NeuGen2.0 is modular and adaptable to new data, and CD3X can isolate intrinsic and extrinsic factors of neuron development by growing the same neurons in different model environments. In combination with the parallelization of simulation software [such as NEURON (Migliore et al., 2006)], these neuron generators are laying the groundwork for enabling massive biologically realistic simulations. Memelli et al. (2013) do not attempt to model the molecular mechanisms of dendritic growth, but instead work to make a concise, computationally efficient model that can capture the structure and variability of realistic morphologies. Their work adds two elements to this field. First, it simplifies the neural growth algorithm to contain a combination of three biologically inspired intrinsic parameters: soma-oriented tropism, dendritic self-avoidance, and membrane stiffness. The three parameters of their growth algorithm are all intrinsic to the cell itself and do not take into account any extrinsic signals that could come from other neurons or physical constraints. Each of these parameters has been previously described, but Memelli et al. are the first to combine them in one simple model. Second, their algorithm is written to be fast and massively parallel, creating the possibility for generating billions of neurons on the IBM Bluegene computer. Their algorithm can generate a neuron in less than two seconds, and when run on parallel cores is capable of generating enough neurons to simulate an entire brain region. Together, these elements fit the need to have morphological diversity within a network as well as the need to have extremely large networks. Each of the current morphology simulators has their particular strengths. The ideal situation would be for Memelli's new algorithm to be incorporated into one of the existing ready-to-use packages. For example, the application of this algorithm within the external constraints of CX3D could help isolate the extrinsic and intrinsic aspects of dendritic arborization. When used together these simulators can help create massive-scale heterogeneous networks for computational modelers and can help investigate how dendrites actually grow.
  10 in total

Review 1.  How do dendrites take their shape?

Authors:  E K Scott; L Luo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Computer generation and quantitative morphometric analysis of virtual neurons.

Authors:  G A Ascoli; J L Krichmar; R Scorcioni; S J Nasuto; S L Senft
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  2001-10

3.  Parallel network simulations with NEURON.

Authors:  M Migliore; C Cannia; W W Lytton; Henry Markram; M L Hines
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Automated reconstruction of neural tissue and the role of large-scale simulation.

Authors:  James Kozloski
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2011-09

5.  Employing NeuGen 2.0 to automatically generate realistic morphologies of hippocampal neurons and neural networks in 3D.

Authors:  S Wolf; S Grein; G Queisser
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-04

6.  NETMORPH: a framework for the stochastic generation of large scale neuronal networks with realistic neuron morphologies.

Authors:  Randal A Koene; Betty Tijms; Peter van Hees; Frank Postma; Alexander de Ridder; Ger J A Ramakers; Jaap van Pelt; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-08-12

7.  Toward a full-scale computational model of the rat dentate gyrus.

Authors:  Calvin J Schneider; Marianne Bezaire; Ivan Soltesz
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Information diversity in structure and dynamics of simulated neuronal networks.

Authors:  Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen; Jugoslava Aćimović; Matti Nykter; Juha Kesseli; Keijo Ruohonen; Olli Yli-Harja; Marja-Leena Linne
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  A framework for modeling the growth and development of neurons and networks.

Authors:  Frederic Zubler; Rodney Douglas
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Self-referential forces are sufficient to explain different dendritic morphologies.

Authors:  Heraldo Memelli; Benjamin Torben-Nielsen; James Kozloski
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.081

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Enhanced Sensitivity to Hyperpolarizing Inhibition in Mesoaccumbal Relative to Nigrostriatal Dopamine Neuron Subpopulations.

Authors:  Rahilla A Tarfa; Rebekah C Evans; Zayd M Khaliq
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Going beyond the current neuroinformatics infrastructure.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Daniel Marcus; John D Van Horn; Qian Luo; Venkata S Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.081

3.  Statistical analysis and data mining of digital reconstructions of dendritic morphologies.

Authors:  Sridevi Polavaram; Todd A Gillette; Ruchi Parekh; Giorgio A Ascoli
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.856

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.