| Literature DB >> 23986275 |
Jasna Leniček Krleža1, Vlasta Ðuranović, Ana Bronić, Desiree Coen Herak, Vlatka Mejaški-Bošnjak, Renata Zadro.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the frequency of inherited and acquired prothrombotic risk factors in children with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in Croatia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23986275 PMCID: PMC3760658 DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Croat Med J ISSN: 0353-9504 Impact factor: 1.351
Figure 1Study population, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and participants enrolled in the study. AIS – arterial ischemic stroke; TIA – transient ischemic attacks; CT – computed tomography; MRI – magnetic resonance imaging; EEG – electroencephalography; TCCD – transcranial color Doppler ultrasonography.
Applied reference intervals (by age and sex) or used cut-off values of studied risk factors
| Age | Limit |
|---|---|
| <6 d | <51.0 |
| <3 mo | <54.0 |
| <6 mo | <63.0 |
| >6 mo and adults | <75.0 |
| <6 d | <26.0 |
| <3 mo | <41.0 |
| <6 mo | <48.0 |
| >6 mo and adults | <75.0 |
| <6 d | <24.0 |
| <3 mo | <40.0 |
| <6 mo | <44.0 |
| >6 mo and adults | <70.0 |
| <12 y | >7.6 |
| >12 y | >15.0 |
| <1 y | >4.7 |
| >1 y | >5.0 |
| <18 y | <0.9 |
| <18 y | >4.3 |
| <1 y | >2.3 |
| >1 y | >1.7 |
| <18 y | >0.3 |
| <18 y | >25 |
| <18 y | >40 |
| <18 y | >1.4 |
| Polymorphisms | |
| <18 y | AA, GA:GG* |
*“Dominant” model: homozygous (AA) or heterozygous (GA) variant in comparison with the homozygous wild-type (GG).
Distribution of prothrombotic risk factors in patients and control group. Obtained values are given as counts and percentages for each risk factor and total for a group of risk factors
| Risk factor | Arterial ischemic stroke (N = 47) | Transient ischemic attack (N = 77) | Controls (N = 42) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 (6.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 6 (12.8) | 8 (10.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 3 (6.4) | 9 (11.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Total of factors | 12 | 17 | 0 |
| 0 factors | 39 (83.0) | 62 (80.5) | 42(100.0) |
| 1 factor | 6 (12.8) | 13 (16.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| 2 factors | 3 (6.4) | 2 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total of patients with any factor | 9 (19.1) | 15 (19.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| GA heterozygote | 2 (4.3) | 3 (3.9) | 2 (4.8) |
| AA homozygote | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| GA heterozygote | 2 (4.3) | 2 (2.6) | 1 (2.4) |
| AA homozygote | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total of factors | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 0 factors | 44 (93.6) | 72 (93.5) | 39 (92.9) |
| 1 factor | 2 (4.3) | 5 (6.5) | 3 (7.1) |
| 2 factors | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total of patients with any factor | 3 (6.4) | 5 (6.5) | 3 (7.1) |
| 7 (14.9) | 9 (11.7) | 5 (11.9) | |
| 15 (31.9) | 24 (31.2) | 10 (23.8) | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 5 (10.6) | 2 (2.6) | 1 (2.4) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3 (6.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| High density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4 (8.5) | 7 (9.1) | 2 (4.8) |
| Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5 (10.6) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (4.8) |
| Total of factors | 32 | 34 | 16 |
| 0 factors | 26 (55.3) | 47 (61.0) | 29 (69.0) |
| 1 factor | 12 (25.5) | 27 (35.0) | 11 (26.2) |
| 2 factors | 7 (14.9) | 2 (2.6) | 1 (2.4) |
| 3 factors | 2 (4.3) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (2.4) |
| Total of patients with any factor | 21(44.7) | 30 (39.0) | 13 (31.0) |
| 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (7.1) | |
| IgG | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| IgA | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| IgM | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 (8.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) | |
| IgG | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| IgA | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IgM | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lupus anticoagulant | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | (0.0) |
| Total of factors | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Number of patients with: | |||
| 0 factors | 43 (91.5) | 76 (98.7) | 38 (80.9) |
| 1 factor | 4 (8.5) | 1 (1.3) | 2 (4.8) |
| 2 factors | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Total of patients with any factor | 4 (8.5) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (7.1) |
Figure 2The percentage of participants with simultaneously present prothrombotic risk factors. In the control group there were no cases with three or more simultaneously present prothrombotic risk factors. AIS – arterial ischemic stroke; TIA – transient ischemic attacks.