Literature DB >> 23986082

Clinical features differ substantially between Caucasian and Asian populations of Marfan syndrome.

Romy Franken1, Alexander W den Hartog, Liz van de Riet, Janneke Timmermans, Arthur J Scholte, Maarten P van den Berg, Vivian de Waard, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Maarten Groenink, James W Yip, Barbara J M Mulder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevention of aortic dissection and sudden death in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) requires accurate diagnosis. MFS is diagnosed by the Ghent criteria, which are primarily based on clinical features of Caucasian MFS populations. We determined whether the Ghent criteria apply to Asian MFS populations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this multicenter study, we included 255 adult MFS patients according to the Ghent criteria of 2010. Patients were excluded if they were neither Caucasian nor Asian. The Asian MFS population (n=49) had a smaller body surface area (BSA: 1.8 m² vs. 2.0 m², P<0.001), a more severely affected aortic root (absolute aortic diameter: 42.9 mm vs. 43.3mm, P=0.802; corrected for BSA: 24.9 mm vs. 21.7 mm, P<0.001; Z-score: 4.5 vs. 3.6, P=0.013), and more often a positive systemic score (75.5% vs. 60.0%, P=0.045), but less frequently ectopia lentis (24.5% vs. 48.1%, P=0.004) compared with the Caucasian population (n=206).
CONCLUSIONS: The Ghent criteria do not necessarily apply to Asian MFS populations, resulting in a more severely affected cardiovascular system. This may be related to under diagnosis of MFS by multiple factors, including the use of Z-score, and genetic and racial differences. The Ghent criteria should be adapted for Asian populations in order to accurately diagnose MFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23986082     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  6 in total

1.  Spinal imaging features in Japanese patients with Marfan syndrome: a case-control study.

Authors:  Eri Hayashida; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Akira Sasao; Tsuyoshi Yasuda; Toshinori Hirai; Hideaki Yuki; Seitaro Oda; Joji Urata; Akihiko Arakawa; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Clinical Characteristics of Marfan Syndrome in Korea.

Authors:  A Young Lim; Ju Sun Song; Eun Kyoung Kim; Shin Yi Jang; Tae-Young Chung; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Kiick Sung; June Huh; I-Seok Kang; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Chang-Seok Ki; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Association between malignancies and Marfan syndrome: a population-based, nested case-control study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chin-Wang Hsu; Jen-Chun Wang; Wen-I Liao; Wu-Chien Chien; Chi-Hsiang Chung; Chang-Huei Tsao; Yung-Fu Wu; Min-Tser Liao; Shih-Hung Tsai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Aortic distensibility in Marfan syndrome: a potential predictor of aortic events?

Authors:  Mitzi M van Andel; Vivian de Waard; Janneke Timmermans; Arthur J H A Scholte; Maarten P van den Berg; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Barbara J M Mulder; Maarten Groenink
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-10

Review 5.  Current state and future directions of genomic medicine in aortic dissection: A path to prevention and personalized care.

Authors:  Alana C Cecchi; Madeline Drake; Chrisanne Campos; Jake Howitt; Jonathan Medina; Scott M Damrauer; Sherene Shalhub; Dianna M Milewicz
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 1.222

6.  Management of a giant aortic root aneurysm in a young patient with Marfan syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Jiayu Shen; Changping Gan; R D T Rajaguru; Dou Yuan; Zhenghua Xiao
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.