BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias have been described to originate from intramural locations. Intramural scar can be assessed by delayed-enhanced MRI, but MRIs cannot be performed on every patient. The objective of this study was to assess the value of voltage mapping to detect MRI-defined intramural scar and to correlate the scar with ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 15 consecutive patients (3 women; age 55±16 years; ejection fraction, 49±13%) with structural heart disease, intramural scar was detected by delayed-enhanced MRI. All patients underwent endocardial unipolar and bipolar voltage mapping guided by the registered intramural scar. Scar volume by MRI was 11.7±8 cm3 with a scar thickness of 4.6±0.7 mm and a preserved endocardial/epicardial rim of 3.3±1.6 and 4.8±2.6 mm, respectively. Endocardial bipolar voltage was 1.6±1.73 mV at the scar, 2.12±2.15 mV in a 1 cm perimeter around the scar, and 2.83±3.39 mV in remote myocardium without scar. The corresponding unipolar voltage was 4.94±3.25, 6.59±3.81, and 8.32±3.39 mV, respectively (P<0.0001). Using receiver-operator characteristic curves, a unipolar cut-off value of 6.78 mV (area under the curve, 0.78) and a bipolar cut-off value of 1.55 mV (area under the curve, 0.69) best separated endocardial measurements overlying scar as compared with areas not overlying a scar. At least 1 intramural ventricular arrhythmia was eliminated in all but 2 patients in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Intramural scar can be detected by unipolar and bipolar voltage, unipolar voltage being more useful. Mapping and ablation of intramural arrhythmias originating from an intramural focus can be accomplished.
BACKGROUND:Ventricular arrhythmias have been described to originate from intramural locations. Intramural scar can be assessed by delayed-enhanced MRI, but MRIs cannot be performed on every patient. The objective of this study was to assess the value of voltage mapping to detect MRI-defined intramural scar and to correlate the scar with ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 15 consecutive patients (3 women; age 55±16 years; ejection fraction, 49±13%) with structural heart disease, intramural scar was detected by delayed-enhanced MRI. All patients underwent endocardial unipolar and bipolar voltage mapping guided by the registered intramural scar. Scar volume by MRI was 11.7±8 cm3 with a scar thickness of 4.6±0.7 mm and a preserved endocardial/epicardial rim of 3.3±1.6 and 4.8±2.6 mm, respectively. Endocardial bipolar voltage was 1.6±1.73 mV at the scar, 2.12±2.15 mV in a 1 cm perimeter around the scar, and 2.83±3.39 mV in remote myocardium without scar. The corresponding unipolar voltage was 4.94±3.25, 6.59±3.81, and 8.32±3.39 mV, respectively (P<0.0001). Using receiver-operator characteristic curves, a unipolar cut-off value of 6.78 mV (area under the curve, 0.78) and a bipolar cut-off value of 1.55 mV (area under the curve, 0.69) best separated endocardial measurements overlying scar as compared with areas not overlying a scar. At least 1 intramural ventricular arrhythmia was eliminated in all but 2 patients in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Intramural scar can be detected by unipolar and bipolar voltage, unipolar voltage being more useful. Mapping and ablation of intramural arrhythmias originating from an intramural focus can be accomplished.
Entities:
Keywords:
ablation; magnetic resonance imaging; mapping; ventricular arrhythmia
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Brian P Betensky; Wei Dong; Benjamin A D'Souza; Erica S Zado; Yuchi Han; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Takuro Nishimura; Hena N Patel; Shuo Wang; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Heather L Smith; Cevher Ozcan; Dalise Y Shatz; Hemal M Nayak; Amit R Patel; Roderick Tung Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Noemi Pavo; Andras Jakab; Maximilian Y Emmert; Georg Strebinger; Petra Wolint; Matthias Zimmermann; Hendrik Jan Ankersmit; Simon P Hoerstrup; Gerald Maurer; Mariann Gyöngyösi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240