| Literature DB >> 23985173 |
Yi Ning1, Aubry Foss2, Amy S Kimball3, Nicholas Neill2, Tricia Matz2, Roger Schultz2.
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an ability to transform into a more aggressive disease, albeit infrequently to B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. While t(14;18)(q32;q21) has been associated with approximately 90% cases of FL, that alteration alone is insufficient to cause FL and associated mutations are still being elucidated. The transformation of FL to B-lymphoblastic leukemia generally includes the dysregulation of MYC gene expression, typically through IGH rearrangement. Such cases of "double-hit" leukemia/lymphoma with both BCL2 and MYC translocations warrant further study as they are often not identified early, are associated with a poor prognosis, and are incompletely understood in molecular terms. Here we describe a patient with a diagnosis of FL that transformed to B-lymphoblastic leukemia. Detailed cytogenetic characterization of the transformed specimen using karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, microarray and gene rearrangement analyses revealed a complex karyotype comprised principally of whole chromosome or whole arm copy number gains or losses. Smaller, single-gene copy number alterations identified by microarray were limited in number, but included amplification of a truncated EP300 gene and alterations in NEIL1 and GPHN. Analyses defined the presence of an IGH/BCL2 fusion due to a translocation as well as a MYC/IGH fusion due to an insertion, with both rearrangements involving the same IGH allele. The data illustrate the value in characterizing double-hit lymphoma cases with both traditional and novel technologies in the detailed cytogenetic workup.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23985173 PMCID: PMC3846067 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cytogenet ISSN: 1755-8166 Impact factor: 2.009
Figure 1A representative karyotype with GTG banding. 84<3n>, XXY,+X,+Y,+1,+2,+2,+5, +del(6)(q13)x2,+del(7)(q11.2),-8,-9,+11,-12, add(13)(q31)x2,-15,-17,del(18)(q21.1),+20,+21,+21, +21,+22,+5mar.
Karyotype and microarray findings in patient
| 84-86<3n>,XXY,+X,+Y,+1,+2,+2,+5, +del(6)(q13)x2,+del(7)(q11.2),-8,-9, +11,-12, add(13)(q31)x2,-15,-17, del(18)(q21.1),+20,+21,+21,+21, +22,+4-6mar[cp10] | arr Xp22.33(1-20,008,989)x2,Xp22.12q28(20,008,989-154,876,029)x3,Yp11.32q12(110,058-57,735,230)x2,1p36.33q21.1(356,951-145,048,953)x3,1q21.1q44(145,048,953-246,504,007)x4,2p25.3p11.2(44,198-88,771,193)x2~3,2p11.2(88,771,193-88,939,959)x0~1,2q11.1q12.2(95,004,544-105,862,051)x4,2q12.2q37.3(105,862,051-242,951,149)x2~3,3q25.32q26.31(159,179,678-176,119,209)x4,3q26.31q29(176,182,216-194,089,843)x1,3q29(194,144,086-199,227,915)x2~3,5p15.33q23.1(129,331-120,819,561)x3,5q23.1q23.3(120,866,799-129,327,006)x1,5q23.3q35.3(129,369,711-180,619,169)x3,6p25.3p12.1(128,203-56,479,183)x4,7p22.3p11.1(130,978-57,496,580)x2~3,8p23.3q22.1(177,781-97,839,693)x1,8q24.21q24.3(128,820,805-146,263,042)x2~3,9q12q34.3(69,466,291-140,130,559)x1,11p15.5q25(188,204-134,425,038)x2~3,12q12q21.31(39,127,058-82,868,278)x3,12q24.11q24.12(108,763,306-110,348,984)x1,13q12.11q14.11(18,454,945-40,050,795)x3,13q14.11q21.31(40,056,371-63,246,713)x1,13q31.2q31.3(87,649,097-92,584,929)x5,14q23.3(66,039,131-66,735,897)x3,14q32.33(105,133,180-106,340,244)x1,15q24.2(73,418,043-73,657,137)x1,17p13.3p13.2(49,128-4,959,848)x1,17p13.2p13.1(5,175,207-8,069,489)x1,17p13.1q25.3(8,094,106-78,612,915)x3,18q21.33q23(58,915,605-76,100,854)x1,20p13q13.33(16,653-62,359,694)x3,21q11.2q22.3(14,406,100-46,915,771)x3,22q11.1q11.22(15,912,798-20,879,638)x3,22q11.22(21,356,310-21,571,621)x1,22q11.22q13.2(21,593,777-39,690,567)x3,22q13.2(39,690,567-39,876,284)x>4,22q13.2q13.33(39,876,284-49,691,432)x3 | Deletion |
| NEIL1 (15q24.2) | ||
| Copy Gain | ||
| GPHN (14q22.3) | ||
| Amplification | ||
| EP300 (22q13.2) |
Figure 2Microarray and FISH findings of transformed follicular lymphoma. Copy losses (blue) and copy gains (pink) for oligonucleotide array-based cooperative genomic hybridization (aCGH) are shown for chromosomes (A) 8, (B) 14, and (C) 18. Note that the zero value for Log2 ratio is reflective of a triploid (3n) genotype (confirmed by karyotypes and FISH), as aCGH cannot discern autosomal ploidy. FISH using indicated BAC probes illustrate (D) co-localization of MYC and BCL2 on a marker chromosome, and (E) co-localization of these genes with IGH on the same marker. Probe colors match the indicated probe names.
Figure 3Molecular delineation of complex rearrangement of the marker chromosome bearing , and . (A) OncoChip™ | B-ALL Panel 2 and standard aCGH are shown for comparison with results indicative of two rearrangements (black arrows on top), one corresponding to the Constant region (class switch) and the other corresponding to the Joining region of the IGH locus as indicated. Locations of primers designed for subsequent confirmatory PCR reactions (red arrows), and the location and directionality of the MYC and BCL2 genes are also indicated. The lines originated from MYC and BCL2 indicate that MYC is inserted into the IGH, while IGH/BCL2 fusion is resulted from a translocation. (B) PCR reactions using the indicated primers confirm the insertion of MYC gene into IGH Constant region and translocation of BCL2 gene to the IGH Joining site.
Figure 4FISH confirmation of a double-hit rearrangement. (A)IGH/BCL2 fusion and (B)MYC/IGH fusion are present on a marker chromosome. Centromeres of chromosomes 8 and 18 were shown in aqua as indicated. Images of Figures 2E and 3A demonstrated that the fusions were on the same marker chromosome.