| Literature DB >> 23984089 |
Prashant Kumar Rai1, Sharad Kumar Gupta, Amrita Kumari Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Geeta Watal.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to scientifically validate the antidiabetic activity of aqueous fruit extract of Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. (Family: Cucurbitaceae) which has been traditionally used for managing diabetes mellitus. This plant commonly known as "Sespadula" in English has not been explored scientifically so far for its glycemic potential except by our research group. The study was conducted with variable doses on normal, mild, and severe diabetics models, and several biochemical parameters including blood glucose level (BGL) were assessed. Maximum fall in BGL of 23.8% in normal rats and of 31.3% in mild diabetic rats was observed during their fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glucose tolerance test (GTT) with the dose of 1000 mg kg(-1). In severely diabetic animals after 4 weeks treatment with FBG, postprandial glucose, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were reduced by 28.7, 30.7, 57.2, and 18.5%, whereas high density lipoprotein, total protein, hemoglobin, and body weight were increased by 33.0, 36.7, 15.7 and 16.7%, respectively. Moreover, urine sugar was reduced from +4 to +1. Thus, the study scientifically validates the traditional use of T. diocia in diabetes management and could be developed as an effective oral agent for treating diabetes mellitus and complications associated with it.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23984089 PMCID: PMC3747504 DOI: 10.1155/2013/473059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharmacol ISSN: 2090-5165
Effect of graded dose of Trichosanthes dioica fruit aqueous extract on FBG of normoglycemic rats (mean ± S.D.).
| Experimental Groups | Treatment (mg kg−1 bw) | Blood glucose levels (mg dL−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | Post treatment (hours) | |||||
| FBG | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | ||
| Control (I) | Distilled water | 69.5 ± 3.9 | 69.3 ± 3.2 | 70.0 ± 4.6 | 70.1 ± 3.8 | 69.2 ± 4.2 |
| Extract (II) | 500 | 70.0 ± 3.2 | 68.8 ± 4.4 | 66.1 ± 4.6 | 62.4 ± 5.1* | 60.1 ± 3.8 |
| Extract (III) | 750 | 68.2 ± 3.2 | 65.9 ± 4.4 | 62.1 ± 4.6 | 58.7 ± 5.1* | 55.6 ± 3.8 |
| Extract (IV) | 1000 | 71.4 ± 3.2 | 68.1 ± 4.4 | 63.5 ± 4.6 | 58.9 ± 5.1** | 54.3 ± 3.8* |
| Extract (V) | 1250 | 72.1 ± 4.6 | 70.4 ± 4.2 | 67.1 ± 4.8 | 65.8 ± 3.7** | 60.4 ± 4.5* |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with control.
Effect of graded doses of T. dioica fruits aqueous extract on BGL during GTT in mild-diabetic rats each value shown in Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).
| Experimental Groups | Treatment (mg kg−1 bw) | Blood glucose levels (mg dL−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | Post treatment (hours) | |||||
| FBG | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Control (I) | Distilled water | 175.4 ± 2.6 | 173.8 ± 3.2 | 391.2 ± 4.1 | 317.4 ± 3.4 | 280.5 ± 4.2 |
| Extract (II) | 500 | 174.8 ± 4.6 | 169.2 ± 4.4 | 329.3 ± 2.9 | 270.4 ± 3.5 | 234.3 ± 2.9 |
| Extract (III) | 750 | 168.4 ± 3.5 | 165.4 ± 3.5 | 314.5 ± 3.1 | 252.6 ± 4.1 | 197 ± 3.7 |
| Extract (IV) | 1000 | 166.6 ± 2.9 | 151.3 ± 4.6 | 258.5 ± 3.3 | 217.4 ± 4.4* | 192.4 ± 3.2** |
| Extract (V) | 1250 | 170.3 ± 3.9 | 163.4 ± 3.8 | 309.6 ± 4.6 | 250.7 ± 3.9* | 200.1 ± 4.2* |
| Tolbutamide (VI) | 250 | 171.2 ± 4.8 | 159.3 ± 3.6 | 259.5 ± 4.1 | 212.4 ± 3.2 | 192.1 ± 3.4** |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to the control at the corresponding time.
Effect of most effective dose of Trichosanthes dioica fruit aqueous extract on BGL of severely diabetic rats (mean ± S.D.).
| Experimental animals | Treatment (aqueous extract) | Pretreatment levels | Posttreatment levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 28 days | |||
| FBG (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 82.2 ± 3.5 | 85.6 ± 2.8 | 84.6 ± 4.6 | 83.9 ± 4.8 | 85.2 ± 3.9 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 287.7 ± 5.7 | 290.9 ± 3.4 | 302.4 ± 4.6 | 299.9 ± 4.9 | 298.7 ± 4.9 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 298.2 ± 7.5 | 274.3 ± 4.6* | 256.5 ± 4.5** | 224.41 ± 4.9 | 212.3 ± 5.2 |
|
| ||||||
| PPG (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 160.8 ± 5.2 | 162.8 ± 4.7 | 163.2 ± 4.9 | 162.1 ± 5.1 | 161.8 ± 4.1 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 447.7 ± 4.8 | 456.1 ± 5.1 | 458.9 ± 3.6 | 452.4 ± 4.5 | 462.8 ± 3.8 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 438.2 ± 3.5 | 386.3 ± 5.2** | 354.6 ± 4.1* | 322.2 ± 4.3* | 303.3 ± 4.5** |
**P< 0.01, *P< 0.05 compared to pretreatment levels.
Effect of most effective dose of Trichosanthes dioica fruit aqueous extract on lipid profile of severely diabetic rats (mean ± S.D.).
| Experimental animals | Treatment (aqueous extract) | Pretreatment levels | Posttreatment levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 28 days | |||
| Total cholesterol (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 95.8 ± 6.4 | 97.2 ± 6.8 | 98.7 ± 5.9 | 98.8 ± 7.4 | 97.5 ± 6.8 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 118.6 ± 4.4 | 116.4 ± 5.6 | 114.9 ± 5.2 | 113.5 ± 4.6 | 115.3 ± 5.5 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 116.4 ± 5.8 | 101.2 ± 4.6** | 99.7 ± 7.5* | 93.6 ± 5.2* | 94.7 ± 5.2*** |
|
| ||||||
| HDL cholesterol (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 28.5 ± 4.2 | 29.8 ± 6.5 | 30.5 ± 4.6 | 29.9 ± 5.9 | 28.7 ± 6.6 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 24.8 ± 2.8 | 24.5 ± 3.2 | 22.6 ± 8.6 | 22.1 ± 6.9 | 22.5 ± 7.6 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 21.0 ± 3.5 | 25.2 ± 4.9* | 25.3 ± 5.1* | 27.9 ± 5.6*** | 28.0 ± 6.8** |
|
| ||||||
| Triglycerides (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 90.9 ± 4.8 | 91.1 ± 5.2 | 91.9 ± 5.4 | 92.1 ± 8.6 | 92.6 ± 8.6 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 199.2 ± 5.2 | 197.8 ± 4.8 | 180.1 ± 5.7 | 191.3 ± 5.9 | 199.6 ± 6.2 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg/kg | 203.8 ± 3.2 | 161.4 ± 4.4* | 101.8 ± 6.1*** | 89.3 ± 5.7* | 87.1 ± 5.7* |
***P< 0.001, **P< 0.01, *P< 0.05 as compared to pretreatment levels.
LDL and VLDL cholesterol (mg dL−1) were calculated with Friedwald's formula.
Effect of most effective dose of Trichosanthes dioica fruit aqueous extract on TP and Hb of severely diabetic rats (mean ± S.D.).
| Experimental animals | Treatment (aqueous extract) | Pre-treatment levels | Post-treatment levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 28 days | |||
| Total protein (mg dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 8.9 ± 1.8 | 8.7 ± 1.2 | 8.5 ± 1.4 | 8.8 ± 2.1 | 8.9 ± 2.2 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 5.6 ± 2.6 | 5.1 ± 2.5 | 5.3 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 2.3 | 5.6 ± 1.5 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 5.4 ± 2.2 | 5.6 ± 2.4* | 6.4 ± 2.2* | 7.1 ± 1.9* | 7.4 ± 2.1* |
|
| ||||||
| Total hemoglobin (g dL−1) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 13.8 ± 2.5 | 13.8 ± 2.5 | 14.2 ± 2.5 | 14.0 ± 2.5 | 14.3 ± 2.5 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 10.3 ± 3.1 | 10.4 ± 2.5* | 10.2 ± 3.7 | 10.7 ± 2.5 | 10.1 ± 2.5 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 11.3 ± 2.7 | 12.0 ± 2.6* | 14.1 ± 2.2** | 13.2 ± 2.5* | 13.1 ± 2.8* |
*P< 0.05, **P< 0.01 compared to pretreatment levels.
Effect of most effective dose of Trichosanthes dioica fruit aqueous extract on US and bw of severely diabetic rats (mean ± S.D.).
| Experimental animals | Treatment (aqueous extract) | Pre-treatment levels | Post-treatment levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 28 days | |||
| Urine Sugar | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| SD (control II) | D W | +++ | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | ++ | + |
|
| ||||||
| Body weight (g) | ||||||
| Normal (control I) | D W | 200 | 200 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| SD (control II) | D W | 190 | 190 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| SD (treated III) | 1000 mg kg−1 | 200 | 200** | 210* | 210* | 210** |
*P< 0.05, **P< 0.01 compared to pretreatment levels.