| Literature DB >> 23983805 |
Yi-Bo Yao1, Yong-Qing Cao, Xiu-Tian Guo, Jin Yi, Hong-Tao Liang, Chen Wang, Jin-Gen Lu.
Abstract
In order to observe the clinical therapeutic effects of Yiqi Kaimi Prescription and biofeedback therapy on treating constipation with deficiency of spleen qi, the 30 cases in the control group were given oral administration of Yiqi Kaimi Prescription, in combination with anus-lifting exercise; the 30 cases in the treatment group were given biofeedback therapy on the basis of the afore mentioned methods for the control group. The TCM symptom scores and anorectal pressures before and after treatment were observed and evaluated. There were significant differences in TCM symptom scores, anorectal pressure, and clinical recovery rate before and after treatment. In the treatment group, the total recovery rate was 86.66%, while in the control group it was 50%; there were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.01). Yiqi Kaimi Prescription coupled with biofeedback therapy is clinically effective for treating constipation with deficiency of spleen qi, and thus this method is applicable for functional constipation with deficiency of spleen qi.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23983805 PMCID: PMC3745844 DOI: 10.1155/2013/830714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The score before and after treatment.
| Treatment group | Control group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Difficult defecation | 2.06 ± 0.37 | 1.06 ± 0.58∗# | 2.07 ± 0.37 | 1.10 ± 0.30* |
| Fecal character | 2.07 ± 0.42 | 0.79 ± 0.38∗# | 2.10 ± 0.45 | 1.34 ± 0.45∗# |
| Defecation time (min) | 2.10 ± 0.30 | 0.96 ± 0.18∗# | 1.87 ± 0.58 | 1.21 ± 0.41# |
| Endless and dilatation felling | 2.03 ± 0.31 | 1.57 ± 0.50∗# | 1.90 ± 0.54 | 1.17 ± 0.38# |
| Frequency | 2.14 ± 0.48 | 0.86 ± 0.48* | 2.10 ± 0.45 | 0.82 ± 0.43* |
| Abdominal distension | 2.17 ± 0.46 | 0.87 ± 0.35∗# | 1.90 ± 0.55 | 1.53 ± 0.51# |
Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 30). Statistical comparisons were made by the Student's t-test. *indicates P < 0.05, compared to that of before; #Indicates P < 0.05, compared to that of control.
Figure 1The trends of fast flick voltage, intermittent contraction, and continuous contraction within 30 days in the treatment group. The anorectal muscle electricity of patients in the treatment group continued to rise in the six-time detection, including the fast flick voltage and intermittent and continuous contraction voltages, which suggested that the strength has been significantly improved.
Figure 2The comparison of the fast flick voltage, intermittent contraction voltages, and continuous contraction voltages among the groups of patients with clinical recovery, patients with excellent effectiveness, patients with effectiveness, and patients with ineffectiveness. (a) The trends of the fast flick voltage among the 4 groups. (b) The trends of the intermittent contraction voltages among the 4 groups. (c) The trends of the continuous contraction voltages among the 4 groups.
The rectum pressure before and after treatment.
| Treatment group | Control group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Anal rest pressure | 38.23 ± 13.14 | 53.70 ± 10.07∗# | 30.90 ± 14.90 | 39.23 ± 10.45# |
| Maximum systolic pressure | 100.48 ± 22.55 | 128.83 ± 23.38∗# | 88.97 ± 20.45 | 95.53 ± 12.19# |
| Rectal initial threshold | 39.73 ± 9.26 | 35.76 ± 5.50 | 37.43 ± 6.67 | 36.53 ± 5.30 |
| Rectal maximum threshold | 246.47 ± 46.50 | 225.13 ± 42.71∗# | 218.83 ± 52.50 | 219.93 ± 45.80 |
Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 30). *indicated P < 0.05, compared to that of the control, #Indicated P < 0.05, compared to that of the before treatment.
The comparison of the clinical effects.
| Groups | Cases | Total effective rate | Clinical recovery rate | Excellent effectiveness rate | Effectiveness rate | Ineffectiveness rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 30 | 26 (86.66%) | 14 (46.7%) | 8 (26.66%) | 4 (13.33%) | 4 (13.33%) |
| Control group | 30 | 15 (50.00%) | 2 (6.66%) | 5 (16.67%) | 8 (26.66%) | 15 (50.00%) |