AIM: To examine the epidemiology and the morphology of the proximal sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to identify patients with SSAs using a university-based hospital pathology database query from January 2007 to April 2011. Data collected included: age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, family history of colorectal cancer, aspirin, and statin use. We collected data on morphology of SSAs including site (proximal or distal), size, and endoscopic appearance (flat or protuberant). We also compared proximal SSAs to proximal tubular adenomas detected during same time period. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients with SSAs were identified: 61% were distal and 39% were proximal SSAs. Proximal SSAs were more likely to be flat than distal (100% vs 78% respectively; P = 0.0001). Proximal SSAs were more likely to occur in smokers (OR = 2.63; 95%CI: 1.17-5.90; P = 0.02) and in patients with family history of colorectal cancer (OR = 4.72; 95%CI: 1.43-15.55; P = 0.01) compared to distal. Proximal SSAs were statistically more likely to be ≥ 6 mm in size (OR = 2.94; P = 0.008), and also more likely to be large (≥ 1 cm) (OR = 4.55; P = 0.0005) compared to the distal lesions. Smokers were more likely to have proximal (P = 0.02), flat (P = 0.01) and large (P = 0.007) SSAs compared to non-smokers. Compared to proximal tubular adenomas, proximal SSAs were more likely to be large and occur in smokers. CONCLUSION: Proximal SSAs which accounted for two-fifths of all SSAs were more likely to present as flat lesions, larger SSAs, and were more likely to occur in smokers and in patients with family history of colorectal cancer. Our data has implications for colorectal cancer screening.
AIM: To examine the epidemiology and the morphology of the proximal sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to identify patients with SSAs using a university-based hospital pathology database query from January 2007 to April 2011. Data collected included: age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, family history of colorectal cancer, aspirin, and statin use. We collected data on morphology of SSAs including site (proximal or distal), size, and endoscopic appearance (flat or protuberant). We also compared proximal SSAs to proximal tubular adenomas detected during same time period. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients with SSAs were identified: 61% were distal and 39% were proximal SSAs. Proximal SSAs were more likely to be flat than distal (100% vs 78% respectively; P = 0.0001). Proximal SSAs were more likely to occur in smokers (OR = 2.63; 95%CI: 1.17-5.90; P = 0.02) and in patients with family history of colorectal cancer (OR = 4.72; 95%CI: 1.43-15.55; P = 0.01) compared to distal. Proximal SSAs were statistically more likely to be ≥ 6 mm in size (OR = 2.94; P = 0.008), and also more likely to be large (≥ 1 cm) (OR = 4.55; P = 0.0005) compared to the distal lesions. Smokers were more likely to have proximal (P = 0.02), flat (P = 0.01) and large (P = 0.007) SSAs compared to non-smokers. Compared to proximal tubular adenomas, proximal SSAs were more likely to be large and occur in smokers. CONCLUSION: Proximal SSAs which accounted for two-fifths of all SSAs were more likely to present as flat lesions, larger SSAs, and were more likely to occur in smokers and in patients with family history of colorectal cancer. Our data has implications for colorectal cancer screening.
Authors: Kristin Wallace; Maria V Grau; Dennis Ahnen; Dale C Snover; Douglas J Robertson; Daus Mahnke; Jiang Gui; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert W Summers; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Robert W Haile; John A Baron Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: P Yang; J M Cunningham; K C Halling; T G Lesnick; L J Burgart; E M Wiegert; E R Christensen; N M Lindor; J A Katzmann; S N Thibodeau Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Juergen Georg Erhardt; Heinz Peter Kreichgauer; Christoph Meisner; Johann Christian Bode; Christiane Bode Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: M L Slattery; K Curtin; K Anderson; K N Ma; L Ballard; S Edwards; D Schaffer; J Potter; M Leppert; W S Samowitz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Qinyan Gao; Kelvin K F Tsoi; Hoyee W Hirai; Martin C S Wong; Francis K L Chan; Justin C Y Wu; James Y W Lau; Joseph J Y Sung; Siew C Ng Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: James R Davenport; Timothy Su; Zhiguo Zhao; Helen G Coleman; Walter E Smalley; Reid M Ness; Wei Zheng; Martha J Shrubsole Journal: Gut Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: David H Kim; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; B Dustin Pooler; Jennifer M Weiss; Perry J Pickhardt Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joseph C Anderson; Audrey H Calderwood; Brock C Christensen; Christina M Robinson; Christopher I Amos; Lynn Butterly Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: J E G IJspeert; P M Bossuyt; E J Kuipers; I Stegeman; T R de Wijkerslooth; E M Stoop; M E van Leerdam; E Dekker Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2015-11-27