Literature DB >> 23983176

Do we need continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes?

Anna Rita Maurizi1, Paolo Pozzilli.   

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is recommended as a core component of diabetic patient's management but it can provide only intermittent snapshots of blood glucose levels missing often hyperglycaemic or hypoglycaemic excursions. Similarly HbA1c alone is unable to provide detailed diagnostic information and it has several limitations. In the modern diabetes monitoring, Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) could be considered as a third pillar, since it provides information on day-to-day change of blood glucose levels and helps achieving treatment targets without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Therefore the use of CGM may reduce glucose variability, improving glycaemic control and decreasing long-term diabetes complications. In fact the availability of continuous glucose data for patients with low and high glucose alerts may impact quality of life with short- and long-term effectiveness. Moreover CGM can be used as a powerful motivational device to change type 2 diabetic patients' lifestyle and to improve their quality of life. Although the studies on the economic feasibility to use CGM as an educational tool must be carried out, we suggest that it can be used as a powerful motivational device to change patients' lifestyle and to improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Type 2 Diabetes; continuous glucose monitoring; glucose variability; glycaemic control

Year:  2013        PMID: 23983176     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Anders L Carlson; Deborah M Mullen; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Personalised Nutritional Recommendations Based on Individual Post-Prandial Glycaemic Responses Improve Glycaemic Metrics and PROMs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Assessment.

Authors:  Madlen Ungersboeck; Xiaowen Tang; Vanessa Neeff; Dominic Steele; Pascal Grimm; Matthew Fenech
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Visit-to-visit glycemic variability is a strong predictor of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Competing risk analysis using a national cohort from the Taiwan diabetes study.

Authors:  Hsien-Tsai Chiu; Tsai-Chung Li; Chia-Ing Li; Chiu-Shong Liu; Wen-Yuan Lin; Cheng-Chieh Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Type 2 Diabetes and the Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Melanie A Jackson; Andrew Ahmann; Viral N Shah
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  Hypoglycaemic therapy in frail older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a choice determined by metabolic phenotype.

Authors:  Alan J Sinclair; Daniel Pennells; Ahmed H Abdelhafiz
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Wearable Contact Lens Biosensors for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using Smartphones.

Authors:  Mohamed Elsherif; Mohammed Umair Hassan; Ali K Yetisen; Haider Butt
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 15.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.