Literature DB >> 23983137

Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study.

Assaad El-Hakim1, Naif Al-Hathal, Talal Al-Qaoud, Ginette Gagné, Suzanne Larocque, Ronald Denis, Kevin C Zorn.   

Abstract

AIM: To study whether the ability to completely stop urinary flow during voiding at time of catheter removal, measured objectively using uroflowmetry, can predict early recovery of urine continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot study, 108 patients with a minimum of 2 years follow-up, operated by a single surgeon (AEH) were subjected to an uroflowmetry at the time of urethral catheter removal following RARP. Normal Saline (150 ml) was instilled intravesically prior to catheter removal and patients were instructed to attempt to stop urine flow during voiding in uroflowmeter. Two groups were studied, group one with positive Stop Test (n = 80) and group two with negative Stop Test (n = 28). Covariates included age, BMI, IPSS score, PSA, tumor stage, prostate volume, nerve sparing status, and estimated blood loss.
RESULTS: Basic characteristics were not statistically different between both groups. Early continence recovery was significantly higher in group one. Pad-free continence rates in group one and two at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 62% vs. 7% (P < 0.001), 85% vs. 28% (P < 0.001), 93% vs. 67% (P 0.001), 93% vs. 82% (P 0.079), 97% vs. 82% (P 0.006), and 97% vs. 85% (P 0.023), respectively. Uroflow Stop Test was the only independent predictor of early urine continence recovery on univariate and multivariate regression analysis [OR 2.87 (95%CI 1.34-4.38, P = < 0.001)].
CONCLUSION: Novel use of uroflowmetry at time of urethral catheter removal is a simple, non-invasive study with independent ability to predict early continence recovery following RARP.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; catheter removal; predictors; recovery of incontinence; urine incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23983137     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  4 in total

1.  [Prevention of postprostatectomy incontinence: etiology and risk factors].

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Hüsch; M Reiter; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Feasibility of planned mini-laparotomy and adhesiolysis at the time of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prior major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Naif Alhathal; Abdullah M Alenizi; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Alhathal; Mathieu Latour; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Long-term urinary functional outcome of vesicourethral anastomosis with bidirectional poliglecaprone (Monocryl®) vs. barbed polyglyconate suture (V-LocTM 180) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Abdullah M Alenizi; Kevin C Zorn; Mansour Alnazari; Walaa Borhan; Marc Zanaty; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.862

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.