OBJECTIVE: Prospective studies regarding the psychosexual impact after different types of breast reconstruction (BR) are scarce. The impact of either implant or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap BR on body image and sexual relationship satisfaction was investigated in time. METHODS: At baseline, 98 women opting for delayed implant or DIEP flap BR after mastectomy for breast cancer completed a survey. The majority was followed up at 6 months (96%) and 20 months (86%) postoperatively. Questionnaires included the body image scale, Dutch Relationship Questionnaire, Short Form - 36 Health Survey and the Impact of Event Scale. RESULTS: Mixed modeling analyses indicated that preoperative body image improved significantly after 20 months (p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of BR. A better body image was related to a better general mental health (p = 0.02), less cancer distress (p < 0.001) and a higher partner relationship satisfaction (p < 0.001). Sexual relationship satisfaction also increased after 20 months (p = 0.01), and it was positively related to higher partner relationship satisfaction but negatively affected by hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Body image and sexual relationship satisfaction significantly improved after BR, and this was not related to the BR type. Psychosexual consequences from previous cancer treatment may interfere. Lower general mental health, higher cancer distress, less partner relationship satisfaction or receiving hormonal therapy can negatively affect body image or sexual relationship satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective studies regarding the psychosexual impact after different types of breast reconstruction (BR) are scarce. The impact of either implant or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap BR on body image and sexual relationship satisfaction was investigated in time. METHODS: At baseline, 98 women opting for delayed implant or DIEP flap BR after mastectomy for breast cancer completed a survey. The majority was followed up at 6 months (96%) and 20 months (86%) postoperatively. Questionnaires included the body image scale, Dutch Relationship Questionnaire, Short Form - 36 Health Survey and the Impact of Event Scale. RESULTS: Mixed modeling analyses indicated that preoperative body image improved significantly after 20 months (p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of BR. A better body image was related to a better general mental health (p = 0.02), less cancer distress (p < 0.001) and a higher partner relationship satisfaction (p < 0.001). Sexual relationship satisfaction also increased after 20 months (p = 0.01), and it was positively related to higher partner relationship satisfaction but negatively affected by hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Body image and sexual relationship satisfaction significantly improved after BR, and this was not related to the BR type. Psychosexual consequences from previous cancer treatment may interfere. Lower general mental health, higher cancer distress, less partner relationship satisfaction or receiving hormonal therapy can negatively affect body image or sexual relationship satisfaction.
Authors: Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy; Benjamin B Massenburg; John M Rozehnal; Nachi Gupta; Jonatan Hernandez Rosa; Michael J Ingargiola; Peter J Taub Journal: Eplasty Date: 2015-09-30
Authors: Maria Herrera de la Muela; Enrique García López; Laura Frías Aldeguer; Paloma Gómez-Campelo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Reinier Timman; Jessica P Gopie; J Nick Brinkman; Annelies Kleijne; Caroline Seynaeve; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Aad Tibben; Marc A M Mureau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240