OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anti-apoptotic cell (anti-AC) antibodies with the 9G4 idiotype (9G4+) and the relationship between this and other known 9G4+ specificities and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serum samples from 60 SLE patients and 40 healthy donors were incubated with apoptotic Jurkat cells and assayed by flow cytometry for the binding of 9G4+ antibodies. The samples were also tested for 9G4+ reactivity against naive B cells and total IgG and IgM anti-AC antibody reactivity. RESULTS: The 9G4+ antibodies bound late ACs in sera from a majority of the SLE patients (60%) but in sera from only 2 healthy control subjects. Among samples with global IgM or IgG anti-AC antibodies, those with 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies predominated. Patients with high levels of 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies were more likely to have active disease. This was the case even in patients with IgG anti-AC antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Patients with lupus nephritis were also more likely to have 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies. While 9G4+ reactivity to ACs often coincided with anti-B cell reactivity, some samples had distinct anti-AC or anti-B cell reactivity. CONCLUSION: The 9G4+ antibody represents a major species of anti-AC antibody in SLE serum, and this autoreactivity is associated with disease activity. The anti-AC reactivity of 9G4+ antibodies can be separated from the germline VH4-34-encoded anti-B cell autoreactivity. Our results indicate that ACs are an important antigenic source in SLE that positively selects B cells with intrinsic autoreactivity against other self antigens. This selection of 9G4+ B cells by ACs may represent an important step in disease progression.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anti-apoptotic cell (anti-AC) antibodies with the 9G4 idiotype (9G4+) and the relationship between this and other known 9G4+ specificities and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serum samples from 60 SLEpatients and 40 healthy donors were incubated with apoptotic Jurkat cells and assayed by flow cytometry for the binding of 9G4+ antibodies. The samples were also tested for 9G4+ reactivity against naive B cells and total IgG and IgM anti-AC antibody reactivity. RESULTS: The 9G4+ antibodies bound late ACs in sera from a majority of the SLEpatients (60%) but in sera from only 2 healthy control subjects. Among samples with global IgM or IgG anti-AC antibodies, those with 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies predominated. Patients with high levels of 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies were more likely to have active disease. This was the case even in patients with IgG anti-AC antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Patients with lupus nephritis were also more likely to have 9G4+ anti-AC antibodies. While 9G4+ reactivity to ACs often coincided with anti-B cell reactivity, some samples had distinct anti-AC or anti-B cell reactivity. CONCLUSION: The 9G4+ antibody represents a major species of anti-AC antibody in SLE serum, and this autoreactivity is associated with disease activity. The anti-AC reactivity of 9G4+ antibodies can be separated from the germline VH4-34-encoded anti-B cell autoreactivity. Our results indicate that ACs are an important antigenic source in SLE that positively selects B cells with intrinsic autoreactivity against other self antigens. This selection of 9G4+ B cells by ACs may represent an important step in disease progression.
Authors: R F van Vollenhoven; M M Bieber; M J Powell; P K Gupta; N M Bhat; K L Richards; S A Albano; N N Teng Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Marco Biggiogera; Maria Grazia Bottone; Anna Ivana Scovassi; Cristiana Soldani; Lorella Vecchio; Carlo Pellicciari Journal: Biol Cell Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Mi-Kyung Chang; Christoph J Binder; Yury I Miller; Ganesamoorthy Subbanagounder; Gregg J Silverman; Judith A Berliner; Joseph L Witztum Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2004-12-06 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Vaishali R Moulton; Abel Suarez-Fueyo; Esra Meidan; Hao Li; Masayuki Mizui; George C Tsokos Journal: Trends Mol Med Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 11.951
Authors: Vanja Sisirak; Benjamin Sally; Vivette D'Agati; Wilnelly Martinez-Ortiz; Z Birsin Özçakar; Joseph David; Ali Rashidfarrokhi; Ada Yeste; Casandra Panea; Asiya Seema Chida; Milena Bogunovic; Ivaylo I Ivanov; Francisco J Quintana; Inaki Sanz; Keith B Elkon; Mustafa Tekin; Fatoş Yalçınkaya; Timothy J Cardozo; Robert M Clancy; Jill P Buyon; Boris Reizis Journal: Cell Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Holly R Steach; Blair L DeBuysscher; Allison Schwartz; Jim Boonyaratanakornkit; Melissa L Baker; Marti R Tooley; Nicholas A Pease; Justin J Taylor Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Kevin S Cashman; Scott A Jenks; Matthew C Woodruff; Deepak Tomar; Christopher M Tipton; Christopher D Scharer; F Eun-Hyung Lee; Jeremy M Boss; Iñaki Sanz Journal: Immunol Rev Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 12.988