Literature DB >> 23982986

Is swollen to tender joint count ratio a new and useful clinical marker for biologic drug response in rheumatoid arthritis? Results from a Swedish cohort.

Lars Erik Kristensen1, Henning Bliddal, Robin Christensen, Johan A Karlsson, Anders Gülfe, Tore Saxne, Pierre Geborek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of swollen to tender joint count ratio (STR) and other baseline characteristics on treatment response to a first course of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
METHODS: Patients with RA initiating their first course of anti-TNF treatment were included in a structured clinical followup protocol. Based on pragmatic thresholds and plausibility, patients were categorized as having low (STR <0.5), moderate (0.5 ≤ STR ≤ 1.0), or high (STR >1.0) joint count ratios. The data were collected and followed during the period of March 1999 through December 2010.
RESULTS: A total of 2,507 patients were included in the study (median age 56 years, 78% women). Of these patients, 344 (14%) had a low STR, 1,180 (47%) had a moderate STR, and 983 (39%) had a high STR. According to these STR thresholds, 23% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18-29%) with low, 39% (95% CI 35-43%) with moderate, and 40% (95% CI 36-44%) with high STR achieved the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 50% improvement (ACR50) response at 6 months after initiation. Correlation tests showed that STR was associated with ACR50 response independent of both swollen and tender joint counts. Logistic regression analysis consistently showed that moderate STR, high STR, not using prednisolone, high baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and low baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were significantly associated with favorable ACR50 response with odds ratios of 1.93 (P < 0.01), 2.82 (P < 0.01), 0.65 (P < 0.01), 1.49 (P < 0.01), and 0.47 (P < 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSION: STR is a new and feasible predictor of treatment response in RA. RA patients with a moderate to high STR have a 2- to 3-fold increased likelihood of responding according to ACR50 criteria.
Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23982986     DOI: 10.1002/acr.22107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  10 in total

1.  The subjective components of the Disease Activity Score 28-joints (DAS28) in rheumatoid arthritis patients and coexisting fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Marina Carotti; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Brain Correlates of Continuous Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis as Measured by Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling.

Authors:  Yvonne C Lee; Alexander Fine; Ekaterina Protsenko; Elena Massarotti; Robert R Edwards; Ishtiaq Mawla; Vitaly Napadow; Marco L Loggia
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Swollen to tender joint count ratio: a novel combination of routine measures to assess pain and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yvonne C Lee
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Pain mechanisms and ultrasonic inflammatory activity as prognostic factors in patients with psoriatic arthritis: protocol for a prospective, exploratory cohort study.

Authors:  Pil Højgaard; Robin Christensen; Lene Dreyer; Philip Mease; Maarten de Wit; Lone Skov; Bente Glintborg; Anton Wulf Christensen; Christine Ballegaard; Henning Bliddal; Kristine Bukhave; Else Marie Bartels; Kirstine Amris; Karen Ellegaard; Lars Erik Kristensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparative assessment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab.

Authors:  Jason H Williams; Matthew M Hutmacher; Matthew L Zierhut; Jean-Claude Becker; Barry Gumbiner; George Spencer-Green; Lisa A Melia; Kai-Hsin Liao; Matthew Suster; Donghua Yin; Ruifeng Li; Xu Meng
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Pain and pain mechanisms in patients with inflammatory arthritis: A Danish nationwide cross-sectional DANBIO registry survey.

Authors:  S Rifbjerg-Madsen; A W Christensen; R Christensen; M L Hetland; H Bliddal; L E Kristensen; B Danneskiold-Samsøe; K Amris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Interpretation of DAS28 and its components in the assessment of inflammatory and non-inflammatory aspects of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Daniel F McWilliams; Patrick D W Kiely; Adam Young; Nalinie Joharatnam; Deborah Wilson; David A Walsh
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03-23

8.  Predictors, demographics and frequency of sustained remission and low disease activity in anti-tumour necrosis factor-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Philip D H Hamann; John D Pauling; Neil McHugh; Gavin Shaddick; Kimme Hyrich
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Clinical predictors of multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marta Novella-Navarro; Chamaida Plasencia; Carolina Tornero; Victoria Navarro-Compán; José L Cabrera-Alarcón; Diana Peiteado-López; Laura Nuño; Irene Monjo-Henry; Karen Franco-Gómez; Alejandro Villalba; Alejandro Balsa
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Ultrasound shows swollen joints are the better proxy for synovitis than tender joints in DMARD-naïve early psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Sayam R Dubash; Oras A Alabas; Xabier Michelena; Leticia Garcia-Montoya; Gabriele De Marco; Mira Merashli; Richard J Wakefield; Paul Emery; Dennis McGonagle; Ai Lyn Tan; Helena Marzo-Ortega
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2021-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.